2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2010.00024.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we argue that the theorization of identity in Falk's model is not sufficiently pluralistic and developmental in nature, the rejection of demographic variables is premature, the claim to predictive power is counterfactual and the model's implementation in a major research project has been hampered by methodological and inferential errors that undermine Falk's claim that the model has been empirically validated. Recent book reviews have summarized Falk's identity model of visitors, highlighting the lack of evidence presented (Bickford, 2010) and the links between Falk's model and standard museum practice (McCray, 2010). We note Falk's acknowledgement of shortcomings within the model he proposed and we suggest that a more authentically contextual and systemic understanding of public engagement experiences within visitors' lives would overcome certain problematic elements of the model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we argue that the theorization of identity in Falk's model is not sufficiently pluralistic and developmental in nature, the rejection of demographic variables is premature, the claim to predictive power is counterfactual and the model's implementation in a major research project has been hampered by methodological and inferential errors that undermine Falk's claim that the model has been empirically validated. Recent book reviews have summarized Falk's identity model of visitors, highlighting the lack of evidence presented (Bickford, 2010) and the links between Falk's model and standard museum practice (McCray, 2010). We note Falk's acknowledgement of shortcomings within the model he proposed and we suggest that a more authentically contextual and systemic understanding of public engagement experiences within visitors' lives would overcome certain problematic elements of the model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Falk (2009) provided limited evidence of the empirical research on which he has based his theoretical model (Bickford, 2010). Therefore the case we explore here is one of several studies that has employed Falk's identity-related segmentation model, a landmark zoo visitor study dubbed the multi-institutional research program (MIRP).…”
Section: Operationalizing Identity-related Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dawson and Jensen () also challenge the methodological approaches employed in the MIRP study for a range of fundamental errors in assumptions and measurement biases. Complementary critiques have also been published highlighting flaws in Falk's approach (e.g., Bickford ) and Falk et al's () questionable survey methods (Marino et al ).…”
Section: Prior Research On Zoo Visitor Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reviewing Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience for Museum Anthropology , I will offer something I haven't seen in other commentaries to date—a positive review. While I agree with many identified shortcomings in previous reviews—including the scarcity of data, the murky methodology, and the unconventional definition of identity—I strongly believe other reviewers have left out an undeniable strength of the book (Bickford 2010; McCray 2010). Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience is a call to action; Falk's new book is inspiring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%