2014
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-1-339-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying woody vegetation on coal surface mines using phenological indicators with multitemporal Landsat imagery

Abstract: Commission VI, WG VI/4KEY WORDS: Afforestation, Ecosystem Recovery, Elaeagnus umbellata, Landsat, Land Cover Change, Mine Reclamation, Exotic Plants ABSTRACT:Surface mining for coal has disturbed large land areas in the Appalachian Mountains. Better information on mined lands' ecosystem recovery status is necessary for effective environmental management in mining-impacted regions. Because record quality varies between state mining agencies and much mining occurred prior to widespread use of geospatial technolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of South Asia requires large reference data because of variability in spectral signatures of varied land use/ land cover (LULC) within this large geographical area. In this regard, RF classification for each of the five AEZ produced far better results than classifying the whole area, an iterative approach was used to add and remove training samples, based on classification results, to improve the map classification and each map was visually assessed to see how well the classified map correlated with observed cropland in the landscape as seen in the sub-meter to 5-m VHRI (Oliphant et al 2014) primarily using WorldView-3 data. The RF MLA was mainly used to generate cropland and non-cropland classes in five AEZs.…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf) Machine Learning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of South Asia requires large reference data because of variability in spectral signatures of varied land use/ land cover (LULC) within this large geographical area. In this regard, RF classification for each of the five AEZ produced far better results than classifying the whole area, an iterative approach was used to add and remove training samples, based on classification results, to improve the map classification and each map was visually assessed to see how well the classified map correlated with observed cropland in the landscape as seen in the sub-meter to 5-m VHRI (Oliphant et al 2014) primarily using WorldView-3 data. The RF MLA was mainly used to generate cropland and non-cropland classes in five AEZs.…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf) Machine Learning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mining sites also have substantial ecological, geological, and cultural value [23,[30][31][32][33][34]. On the other hand, the specific restoration method (e.g., Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 [35] and fast colonizing species [36]) alleviates soil destabilization and water-quality impairment to cause herbaceous communities to proliferate rapidly and widely in mines, while resulting in a poor growing environment for native trees that greatly hinder forest regeneration [37]. However, these studies focused on snapshots that provided limited information on ESs, and dynamic changes in ESs have seldom been examined [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%