2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2250-7_77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Two of Tomatoes Leaf Viruses Using Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, traditional approaches to disease classification via machine learning typically focus on a small number of classes usually within a single crop. Examples include a feature extraction and classification pipeline using thermal and stereo images in order to classify tomato powdery mildew against healthy tomato leaves (Raza et al, 2015 ); the detection of powdery mildew in uncontrolled environments using RGB images (Hernández-Rabadán et al, 2014 ); the use of RGBD images for detection of apple scab (Chéné et al, 2012 ) the use of fluorescence imaging spectroscopy for detection of citrus huanglongbing (Wetterich et al, 2012 ) the detection of citrus huanglongbing using near infrared spectral patterns (Sankaran et al, 2011 ) and aircraft-based sensors (Garcia-Ruiz et al, 2013 ) the detection of tomato yellow leaf curl virus by using a set of classic feature extraction steps, followed by classification using a support vector machines pipeline (Mokhtar et al, 2015 ), and many others. A very recent review on the use of machine learning on plant phenotyping (Singh et al, 2015 ) extensively discusses the work in this domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, traditional approaches to disease classification via machine learning typically focus on a small number of classes usually within a single crop. Examples include a feature extraction and classification pipeline using thermal and stereo images in order to classify tomato powdery mildew against healthy tomato leaves (Raza et al, 2015 ); the detection of powdery mildew in uncontrolled environments using RGB images (Hernández-Rabadán et al, 2014 ); the use of RGBD images for detection of apple scab (Chéné et al, 2012 ) the use of fluorescence imaging spectroscopy for detection of citrus huanglongbing (Wetterich et al, 2012 ) the detection of citrus huanglongbing using near infrared spectral patterns (Sankaran et al, 2011 ) and aircraft-based sensors (Garcia-Ruiz et al, 2013 ) the detection of tomato yellow leaf curl virus by using a set of classic feature extraction steps, followed by classification using a support vector machines pipeline (Mokhtar et al, 2015 ), and many others. A very recent review on the use of machine learning on plant phenotyping (Singh et al, 2015 ) extensively discusses the work in this domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), early identification of three diseases, Cercospora leaf spot, leaf rust, and powdery mildew, was performed using SVM with a radial basis function as kernel [38]. The same idea was deployed in cotton to identify damage by green stink bug, bacterial angular blight, and Ascochyta blight using a SVM classifier [39], as well as in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to identify viruses: tomato yellow leaf curl virus and tomato yellow leaf curl disease [40].…”
Section: Approaches To Icqpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches to disease detection and classification via machine learning in tomato crops have been analysed. First, using RGB images and different machine learning algorithms (SVM, linear kernel, quadratic kernel (QK), radial basis function (RBF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and polynomial kernel), tomato yellow leaf curl disease (TYLCD) is detected [11]. This approach obtained accuracy of 90 % in average.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%