2020
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying tumor clones in sparse single-cell mutation data

Abstract: Motivation Recent single-cell DNA sequencing technologies enable whole-genome sequencing of hundreds to thousands of individual cells. However, these technologies have ultra-low sequencing coverage (<0.5× per cell) which has limited their use to the analysis of large copy-number aberrations (CNAs) in individual cells. While CNAs are useful markers in cancer studies, single-nucleotide mutations are equally important, both in cancer studies and in other applications. However, ultra-low c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that the only difference between Eqs. (10) and 5is the use of DCF rather than CCF . To obtain a probabilistic model for the DCF d, we follow a similar procedure described in Section 2.3 above for the CCF, replacing the inverse transformation…”
Section: Descendant Cell Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observe that the only difference between Eqs. (10) and 5is the use of DCF rather than CCF . To obtain a probabilistic model for the DCF d, we follow a similar procedure described in Section 2.3 above for the CCF, replacing the inverse transformation…”
Section: Descendant Cell Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying the heterogeneity within a tumor is essential for understanding carcinogenesis and devising personalized treatment strategies [2][3][4] . While recent single-cell DNA sequencing technologies enable high-resolution measurements of tumor heterogeneity [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] , the vast majority of cancer studies in research and clinical settings [12][13][14] heterogeneity from SNVs is the Cancer Cell Fraction (CCF) -also known as the cellular prevalence or the mutation cellularity -which is the proportion of cancer cells that contain the SNV. CCFs form the basis for many cancer analyses including: studying tumor heterogeneity 13,15,16 , reconstructing clonal evolution and metastatic progression 13,[17][18][19] , identifying selection [20][21][22] , and analyzing changes in mutational processes over time [23][24][25] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared SECEDO's performance to that of SBMClone (Myers et al, 2020), the current state of the art in SNV-based clustering. Since SBMClone was reported to work only at coverage ≥ 0.2x, and the coverage of the breast cancer dataset is 0.03x, we created higher coverage data in silico by merging sequencing data from cells reported to be in the same cluster by CHISEL.…”
Section: Secedo Recovers Tumor Subclones With Average Precision Of 97% On Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, its use has been limited to the inference of copy number variations (CNVs) and alterations (CNAs) (10X Genomics, 2018;Durante et al, 2020;Velazquez-Villarreal et al, 2020;Zaccaria and Raphael, 2021). The attempts to also use these data for the identification of tumor subclones based solely on SNVs have so far failed to provide a solution that would be able to recover the clonal composition at the original sequencing depth (Myers et al, 2020); in particular, SBMClone, the algorithm of Myers et al (2020), requires a minimum coverage of ≥ 0.2x per cell, roughly four times more than what is currently achievable using the 10X Genomics technology (10X Genomics, 2018;Velazquez-Villarreal et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a great interest of developing computational tools for reasoning tumor trees by addressing the aforementioned issues in SCS data (Jahn et al, 2016;Kuipers et al, 2017;Zafar et al, 2017Zafar et al, , 2019El-Kebir, 2018;Chen et al, 2020;Myers et al, 2020;Sadeqi Azer et al, 2020). SCITE (Jahn et al, 2016) exploits a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based approach to jointly search the best scoring mutation tree and FN rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%