2019
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab59c4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying trade-offs and co-benefits of climate policies in China to align policies with SDGs and achieve the 2 °C goal

Abstract: The Paris Agreement set long-term global climate goals to pursue stabilization of the global mean temperature increase at below 2°C (the so-called 2°C goal). Individual countries submitted their own short-term targets, mostly for the year 2030. Meanwhile, the UN's sustainable development goals (SDGs) were designed to help set multiple societal goals with respect to socioeconomic development, the environment, and other issues. Climate policies can lead to intended or unintended consequences in various sectors, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Van de Ven et al (2019) analysed the impact of land policies and technology subsidies on air pollution, energy access and GHG emissions reductions simultaneously in Eastern African countries. Liu et al (2019) analysed multi-sectoral impacts of climate mitigation scenarios on food security, air quality, energy security and deforestation in China and Fujimori et al (2020) focused on the Asian region and combined several models to understand the impacts of GHG emission reduction on several SDG-related sectors in scenarios aligned with temperature targets included in the Paris Agreement.…”
Section: Existing Literature On Sdg Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Van de Ven et al (2019) analysed the impact of land policies and technology subsidies on air pollution, energy access and GHG emissions reductions simultaneously in Eastern African countries. Liu et al (2019) analysed multi-sectoral impacts of climate mitigation scenarios on food security, air quality, energy security and deforestation in China and Fujimori et al (2020) focused on the Asian region and combined several models to understand the impacts of GHG emission reduction on several SDG-related sectors in scenarios aligned with temperature targets included in the Paris Agreement.…”
Section: Existing Literature On Sdg Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to avoiding the negative consequences of climate change, decarbonization can address a wide range of environmental and social issues, such as ecosystem and environment protection, air quality improvement, food security, public health, livelihood, and poverty alleviation. [15][16][17][18][19] Under these circumstances, China has been treating climate change as an important socioeconomic and political issue. 1,20,21 On September 22, 2020, President Xi Jinping announced the targets of peaking CO 2 emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality before 2060 (Goal 3060), which further strengthened China's climate agenda and spurred low-carbon transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to avoiding the negative consequences of climate change, decarbonization can address a wide range of environmental and social issues, such as ecosystem and environment protection, air quality improvement, food security, public health, livelihood, and poverty alleviation. 1519…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of understanding of the linkages, flexible behavior about trade-offs, and poorly designed sectoral synergies have resulted in incoherent policies, adverse impacts of development on different sectors, lost opportunities for sustainable solutions, and a delayed outcome to progress. Overall, major challenges include high financing costs; insufficient infrastructure; inadequate skills for production and transmission; policy, legal, and regulatory barriers; lack of political will and institutional effectiveness; ownership problems; and poor understanding (Galera 2017;Liu et al, 2019;Asante et al, 2020;Mahama, Derkyi, and Nwabue 2020;Usman, Khalid, and Mehdi 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%