2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying thresholds for relationships between impacts of rationing of nursing care and nurse- and patient-reported outcomes in Swiss hospitals: A correlational study

Abstract: Background-In the Rationing of Nursing Care in Switzerland Study, implicit rationing of care was the only factor consistently significantly associated with all six studied patient outcomes. These results highlight the importance of rationing as a new system factor regarding patient safety and quality of care. Since at least some rationing of care appears inevitable, it is important to identify the thresholds of its influences in order to minimize its negative effects on patient outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results found multiple missed care opportunities in the 24 hours before diagnosis of pneumonia. Numerous previous studies have reported that missed fundamental hospital care is linked to poorer patient outcomes, 17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] a finding that is also supported by our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results found multiple missed care opportunities in the 24 hours before diagnosis of pneumonia. Numerous previous studies have reported that missed fundamental hospital care is linked to poorer patient outcomes, 17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] a finding that is also supported by our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…18,19 Data from some studies support that a large amount of fundamental care is being missed in U.S. acute care hospitals. 17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Furthermore, missed hospital care in both U.S. and international studies has been linked to numerous harmful outcomes for patients and increased cost for hospitals. 17 Two recent systematic reviews of these therapeutic interventions to prevent pneumonia found that the use of oral care was associated with the most evidence of benefit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in eight hospitals in Switzerland found care rationing to be associated with medication errors (OR = 1.68; p  < .005); falls (OR = 2.81; p  < .001); nosocomial infections (OR = 1.61; p  < .04); critical incidents (OR = 1.10; p  < .002); and pressure ulcers (OR = 1.15; p  < .0010) (Schubert et al., 2008). A subsequent analysis of the sample from the previous study (1,338 nurses and 779 patients) sought to define a clinically meaningful rationing threshold level and found consistent reports of nosocomial infections, pressure ulcers and patient satisfaction being sensitive to rationing with negative consequences (Schubert, Clarke, Glass, Schaffert‐Witvliet, & De Geest, 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our quantitative results, however, indicated that nurses still regularly carried out caring practices despite a generally negative perception of their work environment, which is consistent with Schubert et al's (2008) findings that most types of care were rarely rationed. Nevertheless, even infrequent rationing of care has been linked to negative patient outcomes (Schubert, Clarke, Glass, Schaffert-Witvliet, & De Geest, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%