Identifying the Relationship between Trade and Exchange Rate Volatility

Abstract

We develop a model of international trade in which trade depresses real exchange rate volatility and exchange rate volatility impacts trade in products differently according to their degree of differentiation. In particular, commodities are less affected by exchange rate volatility than more highly differentiated products. These insights allow us to simultaneously identify both channels of causation, thereby structurally addressing one of the main shortcomings of the existing empirical literature on the effects of exchange rate volatility on trade -the failure to correct for reverse causality. Using disaggregate trade data for a large number of countries for the period 1970-1997 we find strong results supporting the prediction that trade dampens exchange rate volatility. We find that once we address the reverse-causality problem, the large effects of exchange rate volatility on trade found in some previous literature are greatly reduced. In particular, the estimated effect of currency unions on trade is reduced from 300 percent to be between 10 and 25 percent. * Thanks are due to

On the trade impact of nominal exchange rate volatility

“…In the absence of endogeneity, that is, if E(υ ij |x) = 0, the Poisson PML estimator is defined bỹ 10 Note that whether the error term υij enters additively or multiplicatively is irrelevant, since both representations are observationally equivalent. For further discussion on this, see Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2003) and the references therein.…”

Global Bond Portfolios and EMU

“…A basic reason is that the volume of trade is a good predictor of the level of bilateral exchange rate volatility (Devereux andLane 2003, Broda andRomalis 2003). As such, currency risk is minimized by preferring the bonds of major trading partners.…”

Real Exchange Rate, Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade Balance in Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) Approach

“…Furthermore, the negative effects of the rising wave of globalization and financial integration for all open economies have resulted in exchange rate volatility with significant effect on their economic performance. Empirically, several studies have examined the relationship among exchange rate, exchange rate volatility and trade (Arize, Osang and Slottje, 2000; Behmani-Oskooee and Hegerty, 2008; Olayungbo, Yinusa and Akinlo, 2011; Wooi and Baharumshah, 2010;Aydin, 2010;Broda, 2003, Danmola, 2013, but these studies have generated mixed results. Furthermore, empirical literature shows that most of the panel studies on exchange rate volatility and trade are characterized by pooling of countries from different macro-economic environment together (see Kharroubi, 2011;Bleaney and Manuela, 2007;Aydin, 2010), and these tend to generate a bias result.…”