Identifying the Relationship between Livelihoods and Land Ecosystem Services Using a Coupled Model: A Case Study in the “One River and Two Tributaries” Region of Tibet

Abstract

In fragile and impoverished areas, identifying the interrelationship between livelihoods and ecosystem services can help protect the ecological environment and improve human well-being. This study selected the “One River and Two Tributaries” region (ORTTR) in Tibet with a fragile, sensitive ecological environment as the study area. With the years 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 as the research time points, a coupled evaluation model of residents’ livelihood and land ecosystem services was constructed to study the relationship between the two. Results showed that from 2000 to 2020, the coupling degree and coupling coordination degree between the two continued to increase because of the improvement in residents’ livelihood and ecosystem services. The level of coupling coordination gradually changed from a reluctant coordination stage to a moderate coordination stage. The coupling coordination degree showed more revealing results than the coupling degree in time scale. The relative development type between the two was mainly of the type lagging residents’ livelihood. By considering the physical geography and socio-economic characteristics and the relative development types, the counties and districts in the ORTTR are divided into ecological conservation areas, ecological restoration areas, and ecological reconstruction areas. The coupled model can evaluate the relationship between livelihoods and ecosystem services from a systematic integration perspective and provide scientific support for the improvement of regional human well-being.

Assessing local people's perceptions of ecosystem services to support land management plans in arid desert regions, northwest China

“…To inform policy development, and to prevent harming the well-being of local people [ 37 ], it is important to consider the needs and perspectives of local people. Consequently, it is necessary to understand how local community residents with different livelihood strategies to identify [ 38 ], and use ES in desert arid regions, and which ES in desert arid regions would be more valued and prioritized. We are aware of few studies that have employed social science research techniques to determine ES from the perspective of residents in the desert arid regions of northwest China.…”

Sustainability of Family Hope Program in Batu Bersurat Village, XIII Koto Kampar District, Kampar Regency, Riau, Indonesia

“…In vulnerable and impoverished regions, recognizing the interdependent connection between people's livelihoods and ecosystem services can aid in safeguarding the natural environment while enhancing the quality of life for humans. (Wei et al, 2022).…”