2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11589-017-0182-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the occurrence time of an impending major earthquake: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(61 reference statements)
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable that the occurrence of the two EQs under study took place almost a week after the criticality condition κ 1 = 0.070 has been met for various magnitude thresholds. This compares favorably with the time window of a few days up to one week already found from various SES activities in Greece, Japan and United States [2,4,18,[36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is notable that the occurrence of the two EQs under study took place almost a week after the criticality condition κ 1 = 0.070 has been met for various magnitude thresholds. This compares favorably with the time window of a few days up to one week already found from various SES activities in Greece, Japan and United States [2,4,18,[36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is observed in Figures 2-7. This is a significant finding that has been acknowledged by numerous investigators [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]61,64,[70][71][72]74,[85][86][87][88][89][90]. As extensively discussed in the above publications, the employed methods reveal hidden patterns in the time series, and for this reason their time evolution is different from that of the time series.…”
Section: Time Series (Subfigures (A) Of Figures 2-7)mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The extent of the usefulness of this result for the case of the M W 9 Tohoku EQ in 2011 and in particular for the determination of its occurrence time has been recently investigated by Varotsos et al (2017). They reviewed, in the light of the recent advances, the procedure to identify the occurrence time which in general is achieved by computing the j 1 values of the seismicity occurring in the candidate epicentral area after the initiation of the SES activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reviewed, in the light of the recent advances, the procedure to identify the occurrence time which in general is achieved by computing the j 1 values of the seismicity occurring in the candidate epicentral area after the initiation of the SES activity. Along these lines, for the case of the M W 9 Tohoku EQ, Varotsos et al (2017) computed the j 1 values of seismicity in the epicentral area estimated in Sarlis et al (2015) by starting this computation from January 5, 2011, since it is the date of the appearance of the deepest minimum b W,min , which was found to be simultaneous )-as mentioned above-with the anomalous geomagnetic field variations and hence with strong SES activity. The results of this computation showed that the condition j 1 = 0.070 (which signals that the mainshock is going to occur within a few days or so) was fulfilled almost one day before the Tohoku EQ (Varotsos et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%