Identifying the key areas for benchmarking towards the improvement of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) construction firms in developing countries: the case of Ghana

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to identify key areas for benchmarking (BM) towards the improvement of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) construction firms in developing countries.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed the use of the quantitative research method in the collection and analysis of primary data collected from field surveys using a piloted close-ended questionnaire created following a review of available literature on BM. Based on 63 solicited views of professionals with SMEs (quantity surveyors, project managers and architects) data collected were statistically analysed using a one-sample t-test.FindingsThe findings of the study indicate that the key areas for BM towards the improvement of SME construction firms in developing countries in order of relevance are “Financial Performance”, “Competitiveness”, “Customer Satisfaction”, “Technology Advancement”, “Communication Skills”, “Collaboration”, “Employee Satisfaction” and “Product orientation”.Practical implicationsThe study has given more insight into the areas that need more attention for SMEs BM to achieve improvement. It can therefore be suggested firms that adapted identified areas will derive the benefits of BM. It is further opined that more BM education should be provided to various SMEs construction firms to facilitate an effective and efficient BM regime aiming at performance enhancement in project delivery.Originality/valueThis forging research attempts to identify the key areas for BM towards the improvement of SMEs construction firms in developing countries. Although there have been several efforts to create BM tools for the construction industry.

Socio-political factors underlying the adoption of green bond financing of infrastructure projects: the case of Ghana

“…To determine the relative importance of the variables, one sample t -test was used similar to the study of Kissi et al. (2022).…”

“…To determine the relative importance of the variables, one sample t-test was used similar to the study of Kissi et al (2022). For the one-sample t-test, the study used a hypothesised mean of 3.5, indicating that a component with a mean score of 3.5 or above is a significant social factor underpinning the adoption of green bonds in infrastructure funding.…”

Relationship of knowledge sharing and innovation intention on the continuous quality improvement in university setting

“…The used information was extracted as a basis for building and formulating goals, strategies and various management systems (Kissi et al, 2023).…”