2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1505.06666
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the invariants for classical knots and links from the Yokonuma-Hecke algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The defining relations may also be expressed in terms of diagram. For instance, recall from [3] that relation (5) corresponds to move the tie from top to bottom behind or in front of the strand (see Figure13). For more details about type-A relations see [3, 5) and ( 6) in terms of diagrams (n = 3)…”
Section: The Tied Braid Monoid Of Type Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The defining relations may also be expressed in terms of diagram. For instance, recall from [3] that relation (5) corresponds to move the tie from top to bottom behind or in front of the strand (see Figure13). For more details about type-A relations see [3, 5) and ( 6) in terms of diagrams (n = 3)…”
Section: The Tied Braid Monoid Of Type Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, by using Jones' method invariants for: framed links [17], classical links [15] and singular links [16] were constructed. Moreover, recently it was proved that the invariants for classical links constructed in [15] are not topologically equivalent either to the Homflypt polynomial or to the Kauffman polynomial, see [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet they could be topologically equivalent to the Homflypt polynomial, in the sense that they might distinguish the same pairs of non-isotopic links. Eventually, in a recent development [2], another presentation for the Yokonuma-Hecke algebra is employed with parameter q in a new quadratic relation, where q 2 = u [6]. Using this presentation, the authors of [2] have been able to establish that the classical link invariants, Θ d , obtained from the isomorphic algebra Y d,n (q) coincide with the Homflypt polynomial on knots, but they are not topologically equivalent to the Homflypt polynomial on links (as it was conjectured in [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing now on the classical link invariants from the algebra FTL d,n (u), these need to be compared to the Jones polynomial. Following [2], in Section 7 we give a new presentation for the algebra FTL d,n with parameter q deriving from the new presentation of the Yokonuma-Hecke algebra Y d,n (q). We then adjust our results so far to the isomorphic algebra FTL d,n (q) and we apply them to the results of [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation