Identifying targets for increased biogas production through chemical and organic matter characterization of digestate from full-scale biogas plants: what remains and why?

Abstract

Background This study examines the destiny of macromolecules in different full-scale biogas processes. From previous studies it is clear that the residual organic matter in outgoing digestates can have significant biogas potential, but the factors dictating the size and composition of this residual fraction and how they correlate with the residual methane potential (RMP) are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to generate additional knowledge of the composition of residual digestate fractions and to understand how they correlate with various operational and chemical parameters. The organic composition of both the substrates and digestates from nine biogas plants operating on food waste, sewage sludge, or agricultural waste was characterized and the residual organic fractions were linked to substrate type, trace metal content, ammonia concentration, operational parameters, RMP, and enzyme activity. Results Carbohydrates represented the largest fraction of the total VS (32–68%) in most substrates. However, in the digestates protein was instead the most abundant residual macromolecule in almost all plants (3–21 g/kg). The degradation efficiency of proteins generally lower (28–79%) compared to carbohydrates (67–94%) and fats (86–91%). High residual protein content was coupled to recalcitrant protein fractions and microbial biomass, either from the substrate or formed in the degradation process. Co-digesting sewage sludge with fat increased the protein degradation efficiency with 18%, possibly through a priming mechanism where addition of easily degradable substrates also triggers the degradation of more complex fractions. In this study, high residual methane production (> 140 L CH4/kg VS) was firstly coupled to operation at unstable process conditions caused mainly by ammonia inhibition (0.74 mg NH3-N/kg) and/or trace element deficiency and, secondly, to short hydraulic retention time (HRT) (55 days) relative to the slow digestion of agricultural waste and manure. Conclusions Operation at unstable conditions was one reason for the high residual macromolecule content and high RMP. The outgoing protein content was relatively high in all digesters and improving the degradation of proteins represents one important way to increase the VS reduction and methane production in biogas plants. Post-treatment or post-digestion of digestates, targeting microbial biomass or recalcitrant protein fractions, is a potential way to achieve increased protein degradation.

Energy-Efficient AnMBRs Technology for Treatment of Wastewaters: A Review

“…Some studies have demonstrated that biogas production could be observed in An-MBRs during treatment of municipal wastewaters. Indeed, biogas may be produced via organic matter degradation by methanogens through anaerobic digestion [26,150,[186][187][188]. Generally, the biogas generated is a combination of methane, carbon dioxide, and trace gases.…”

Financial Tools for Biogas Project Implementation at Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Case Study of the Russian Federation

“…For example, digested effluent can be combined with other waste materials such as wood chip, straw or green wastes prior to composting to provide a pasteurized productthis is the best way to improve ecological safety and make valuable fertilizer. In addition, a significant amount of produced methane remains dissolved in the effluents -it can be recovered by special post-treatment techniques [22]- [25].…”

Foaming Tendency in Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Inoculated with Anaerobic Sludge and Cow Manure: Effect of Protein Concentration

“…Over time, high organic loading leads to an increase in the population of acidogenesis bacteria that produces acids. However, the methanogenic bacteria would not be able to consume the acids as quickly, resulting in the accumulation of acids causing a large proportion of organic matter to remain in the digestate after the treatment [14].…”