Identifying Subtypes of Spousal Assaulters Using the B-SAFER

Thijssen, Jill; Ruiter, Corine de

doi:10.1177/0886260510369129

Cited by 52 publications

(101 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Future studies should recruit larger samples in order to possibly identify dyadic interaction specificities in different subgroups. Indeed, studies conducted with adult samples have found that those who inflict more severe violence are different from those who inflict less severe or less chronic violence (Cunha & Gonçalves, 2013;Thijssen & De Ruiter, 2011). A typological approach may offer an insightful mean to identify such profiles in adolescents.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conflict resolution patterns and violence perpetration in adolescent couples: A gender‐sensitive mixed‐methods approach

Fernet

Hébert

Paradis

2016

Journal of Adolescence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study used a sequential two-phase explanatory design. The first phase of this mixed methods design aimed to explore conflict resolution strategies in adolescent dating couples, and the second phase to document, from both the perspective of the individual and of the couple, dyadic interaction patterns distinguishing youth inflicting dating violence from those who do not. A sample of 39 heterosexual couples (mean age 17.8 years) participated in semi-structured interviews and were observed during a 45 min dyadic interaction. At phase 1, qualitative analysis revealed three main types of conflict resolution strategies: 1) negotiating expectations and individual needs; 2) avoiding conflicts or their resolution; 3) imposing personal needs and rules through the use of violence. At phase 2, we focused on couples with conflictive patterns. Results indicate that couples who inflict violence differ from nonviolent couples by their tendency to experience conflicts when in disagreement and to resort to negative affects as a resolution strategy. In addition, while at an individual level, they show a tendency to withdraw from conflict and to use less positive affect, at a dyadic level they present less symmetry. Results offer important insights for prevention programs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conflict resolution patterns and violence perpetration in adolescent couples: A gender‐sensitive mixed‐methods approach

Fernet

Hébert

Paradis

2016

Journal of Adolescence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Their study did not find distinct groups of the borderline / dysphoric and generally violent/antisocial types (Delsol, Margolin, & John, 2003). It is also important to note, however, that these typologies were developed based on Thijssen and de Ruiter (2011) concluded that the IPV recidivism rate for this subtype was seven percent.…”

Section: Holtzwoth-munroe's Typologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Extending the typology, the authors (HoltzworthMunroe, Meehan, Herron, Rehman, & Stuart, 2000) added another subtype known as low level anti-social perpetrators which has also been supported through research (Huss & Ralston, 2008;Loinaz, 2014;Thijssen & de Ruiter, 2011). However, evidence about the stability of these typologies is relatively weak as it is difficult to distinguish between generally violent and borderline/ dysphoric men(Holtzworth-Munroe, Meehan, Herron, Rehman, & Stuart, 2003).…”

Section: Holtzwoth-munroe's Typologymentioning

confidence: 99%

A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications

Ali

Dhingra

McGarry

2016

Aggression and Violent Behavior

163

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intimate partner violence is an important issue and attempts to distinguish typologies of intimate partner violence are necessary to understand the complexities of intimate partner violence, its various causes, correlates, and consequences. Over the last two decades, much research was aimed at classifying types of violence depending on the similarities and differences in patterns of violence. However, it is difficult to find a single account that provides a succinct and up-to-date overview of these classifications. As a result, considerable effort is required to identify and retrieve relevant papers to understand each typology or classification of intimate partner violence. This article provides a succinct and up-to-date integrative review of various classifications of intimate partner violence.Typologies by form of abuse, type of violence, type of perpetrator (men and women) are critically reviewed in the light of available literature and the strengths and limitations of each are described. Recommendations for further research are also provided. Keywords:Typologies, intimate partner violence, classification, male perpetrators, female perpetrators Literature Review 3 Highlights It is often difficult to find an aggregated review of various typologies of IPV  We present an integrative account of various typologies by form of abuse, type of violence and type perpetrator  All typologies contribute to our understanding of IPV  Further research is needed to test these typologies  Further research is needed to explore if the impact of IPV differs depending on type of IPV Literature Review 4

show abstract

“…They obtain significantly higher scores in sexist cognitions (Johnson et al 2006) and they are considered to be high risk batterers (Cavanaugh & Gelles, 2005). Among their differentiating aspects we can include a greater probability of recidivism (Eckhardt et al, 2008;Loinaz, 2011;Thijssen & de Ruiter, 2011) and of having ASPD (Spidel et al, 2007).…”

Section: The Antisocial/generally Violent Batterer: a Psychopathologimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the widely discussed subtypes is that known as generally violent/antisocial (Holtzworth-Munroe, Meehan, Herron, Rehman & Stuart, 2000;Thijssen & de Ruiter, 2011), which has been called different things in the existing studies, such as antisocial (Johnson et al, 2006;Loinaz, Ortiz-Tallo, Sánchez & Ferragut, 2011), instrumental/sub-controlled (Dutton, 2007), psychopathic (Fowler & Westen, 2011), highly-expressive anger (Eckhardt, Samper & Murphy, 2008) or generalised violence/emotionally unstable/socially unintegrated (Loinaz, Echeburúa & Torrubia, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

El maltratador psicópata en la pareja: un perfil no psicopatológico

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Título: El maltratador psicópata en la pareja: un perfil no psicopatológico. Resumen: En este estudio teórico se hace una revisión sobre dos de los perfiles de maltratadores conyugales más citados en la literatura científica, resaltando específicamente las diferencias más notables entre ambos, así como también los criterios en los cuales convergen. Se debate también una de las controversias más prolongadas a través de los diversos estudios de investigación, incluyéndose la concreta panorámica al respecto en España, que es la referente a la constante y errónea equiparación entre psicopatía y trastorno antisocial de la personalidad. Asimismo, se presta especial atención a las implicaciones derivadas de considerar a los maltratadores conyugales bien con un perfil psicopatológico o bien con un perfil psicopático, haciendo especial hincapié en el papel específico que juega la psicopatía en el maltrato conyugal y poniendo de relieve aspectos concernientes a los maltratadores psicópatas tales como sus motivaciones específicas para perpetrar violencia conyugal y los instrumentos de evaluación de este concreto perfil. Finalmente, se señalan una serie de directrices futuras de investigación sobre el perfil del maltratador psicopático. Palabras clave: Maltrato; psicopatía; trastorno antisocial de la personalidad; violencia en la pareja.Abstract: This theoretical study reviews two of the most cited profiles of intimate partner batterers in the scientific literature, paying special attention to the most notable differences between them, as well as to their common criteria. The study also discusses one of the longest standing controversies in various research studies, including the particular overview with respect to Spain: it being the constant yet erroneous reference to the equivalence of psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. Similarly, special attention is paid to the implications of considering intimate partner batterers as having either a psychopathological or psychopathic profile, while also stressing the specific role played by psychopathy in the intimate partner batterer and, concerning psychopathic intimate partner batterers, such aspects as their specific motives for perpetrating intimate partner violence and the evaluation instruments of this particular profile. Finally, a series of future directives for research concerning psychopathic intimate partner batterers are also pointed out.

show abstract

Identifying Subtypes of Spousal Assaulters Using the B-SAFER

Cited by 52 publications

References 16 publications

Conflict resolution patterns and violence perpetration in adolescent couples: A gender‐sensitive mixed‐methods approach

Conflict resolution patterns and violence perpetration in adolescent couples: A gender‐sensitive mixed‐methods approach

A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications

El maltratador psicópata en la pareja: un perfil no psicopatológico

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About