2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying structural variation in haploid microbial genomes from short-read resequencing data using breseq

Abstract: BackgroundMutations that alter chromosomal structure play critical roles in evolution and disease, including in the origin of new lifestyles and pathogenic traits in microbes. Large-scale rearrangements in genomes are often mediated by recombination events involving new or existing copies of mobile genetic elements, recently duplicated genes, or other repetitive sequences. Most current software programs for predicting structural variation from short-read DNA resequencing data are intended primarily for use on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
257
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
257
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used breseq (version 0.26.0) (56,57) to identify mutations in evolved genomes by comparing Illumina reads to a version of the complete genome sequence of REL606 (17) with updated feature annotations (included in Dataset S1). As necessary, we manually curated breseq results to eliminate spurious predictions and to resolve predictions of sequence junctions and changes in read-coverage depth into structural mutations (57). To check mutation predictions, we applied the reported sequence changes to the ancestral genome sequence and reran breseq to verify that there were no further discrepancies between the reads and the mutated reference genome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used breseq (version 0.26.0) (56,57) to identify mutations in evolved genomes by comparing Illumina reads to a version of the complete genome sequence of REL606 (17) with updated feature annotations (included in Dataset S1). As necessary, we manually curated breseq results to eliminate spurious predictions and to resolve predictions of sequence junctions and changes in read-coverage depth into structural mutations (57). To check mutation predictions, we applied the reported sequence changes to the ancestral genome sequence and reran breseq to verify that there were no further discrepancies between the reads and the mutated reference genome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5; two indels identified in ref. 13 and one mistaken call have been added (see SI Material and Methods).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breseq pipeline assembles a referencebased alignment to predict mutations compared to a previously sequenced genome (NCBI GenBank accession number NC_007779.1, E. coli K-12 W3110). Newer versions of breseq now predict structural variations, including large deletions, mobile element insertions, and gene duplications, all of which account for much of the genetic diversity in evolved clones (50)(51)(52)(53).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sequenced genomes of selected isolates and then identified genetic variants using the breseq pipeline (48)(49)(50). The breseq pipeline assembles a referencebased alignment to predict mutations compared to a previously sequenced genome (NCBI GenBank accession number NC_007779.1, E. coli K-12 W3110).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%