2018
DOI: 10.1257/app.20170068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Sorting in Practice

Abstract: We propose a novel methodology to uncover the sorting pattern in labor markets. We identify the strength of sorting solely from a ranking of firms by profits. To discern the sign of sorting, we build a noisy ranking of workers from wage data. Our test for the sign of sorting is consistent even with noisy worker rankings. We apply our approach to a panel dataset that combines social security earnings records with detailed financial data for firms in the Veneto region of Italy. We find robust evidence of positiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(69 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since an important concern in our analysis is to tackle the issue of the unobserved heterogeneity that can bias the cross-sectional estimates, we then carry out quantile fixed effects estimates (Canay 2011). In fact, in the literature unobserved worker heterogeneity has been proved to be very important in affecting the relationship between rents and wages since high-skilled workers may sort into highly profitable firms (Arai and Heyman 2001;Bartolucci et al 2015;Margolis and Salvanes 2001;Martins 2009). Furthermore, recent papers have also taken into account firm unobserved heterogeneity that might play a crucial role in affecting firm profitability and rent sharing policies.…”
Section: Econometric Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an important concern in our analysis is to tackle the issue of the unobserved heterogeneity that can bias the cross-sectional estimates, we then carry out quantile fixed effects estimates (Canay 2011). In fact, in the literature unobserved worker heterogeneity has been proved to be very important in affecting the relationship between rents and wages since high-skilled workers may sort into highly profitable firms (Arai and Heyman 2001;Bartolucci et al 2015;Margolis and Salvanes 2001;Martins 2009). Furthermore, recent papers have also taken into account firm unobserved heterogeneity that might play a crucial role in affecting firm profitability and rent sharing policies.…”
Section: Econometric Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also related isBartolucci et al (2015), who rank firms according to their profits, and find evidence of positive sorting using Italian data.7 In other words, k : {1, ..., J} → {1, ..., K} maps firm j to firm class k(j).8 Here we abstract from firm-level observable characteristics. We return to this issue in Section 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we apply the method pioneered by Abowd et al (1999) and perfected by Card et al (2013) to separate in a wage equation the individual and rm components, and we use those as measures of rm's and a worker's quality, respectively. Aware that these measures can be imprecise and, particularly for rms, may not be highly correlated with actual productivity (Eeckhout & Kircher 2011), we also follow Bartolucci et al (2018) in using more direct measures of productivity and protability of rms as measures of the quality of rms. In the second step, we calculate two measures of the strength of positive assortative matching between rms and workers in each of the 101 French Districts, separately, for each year between 1995 and 2005.…”
Section: Data and Measures Of Worker And Rm Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ductivity type (de Melo 2018, Eeckhout & Kircher 2011, Gautier & Teulings 2006. Hence, in the same vein as Bartolucci et al (2018), we adopt an alternative measure of rm quality which more closely captures productivity compared to the wage-pay potential: the labor productivity of a rm in a given year measured as Value Added per Worker, VAPW. 23 From our empirical analysis we can also (indirectly) argue whether worker-rm matching increases the total potential payroll paid to workers (as revealed by AKM rm xed eects), or the total value-added generated by them.…”
Section: Quality Of Workers and Quality Of Rmsmentioning
confidence: 99%