2008
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m2442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Smokers with a Medical Extraction System

Abstract: The Clinical Language Understanding group at Nuance Communications has developed a medical information extraction system that combines a rule-based extraction engine with machine learning algorithms to identify and categorize references to patient smoking in clinical reports. The extraction engine identifies smoking references; documents that contain no smoking references are classified as UNKNOWN. For the remaining documents, the extraction engine uses linguistic analysis to associate features such as status … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McGinnis et al (2011) used VA EHR health factors to reliably identify current smokers), and unstructured data (e.g. Clark et al (2008);Savova et al (2008); Da Silva et al (2011) applied natural language processing methods to EHR clinical notes to identify smoking status).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGinnis et al (2011) used VA EHR health factors to reliably identify current smokers), and unstructured data (e.g. Clark et al (2008);Savova et al (2008); Da Silva et al (2011) applied natural language processing methods to EHR clinical notes to identify smoking status).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It employs support vector machines to attribute semantic categories to each word in discharge summaries. In [9] they developed a medical information extraction system that combines a rule-based extraction engine with machine learning algorithms to identify and categorize references in clinical reports to patients who smoke.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first experiment was performed to evaluate the performance of online forum discussion against the clinical reports (baseline method (Clark et al, 2008)) in the smoking status classification problem. The experiment used the baseline method, which achieved the best results in the smoking status challenge (Uzuner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Compare With Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark et al (Clark et al, 2008) developed the best performing system in the i2b2 challenge. They used the binary presence of unigram and bigram word features of document with SVM classifier algorithm and 10 cross-validation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%