2020
DOI: 10.37934/arbms.20.1.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Relevant Predictor Variables for a Credit Scoring Model using Compromised-Analytic Hierarchy Process (Compromised-AHP)

Abstract: Developing an efficient credit scoring model to reduce the risk of personal-loan defaulters involves the selection of manageable reliable predictor variables in order to avoid the potential clients from providing too much information and to reduce the burden of a bank from keeping huge historical data, which can be burdensome and costly. The objective of this paper is therefore to illustrate how compromised-AHP can be used as one the methods to select such relevant reliable predictor variables before the final… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, we can see the implementation for optimizing donation in healthcare, such as organ, blood, or medicine donation. There are several other methods for decision analysis such as multi-criteria decision analysis, compromised Analytic Hierarchy Process, and artificial neural network predictive model [21][22][23]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study for optimizing smartphone donation using the decision tree technique.…”
Section: Literature Review: Decision Tree Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we can see the implementation for optimizing donation in healthcare, such as organ, blood, or medicine donation. There are several other methods for decision analysis such as multi-criteria decision analysis, compromised Analytic Hierarchy Process, and artificial neural network predictive model [21][22][23]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study for optimizing smartphone donation using the decision tree technique.…”
Section: Literature Review: Decision Tree Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chu et al in [ 19 ] describe and compare 18 PDMs, although some authors suggest that only 15 are distinctive. Undoubtedly, several other PDMs have appeared in the literature since Chu et al [ 19 ] published their study; see, for example, [ 29 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 93 , 94 , 95 ]. Obviously, if the PCM is consistent, then all known PDMs match, although they do not guarantee that the resulting PV is error-free; see, e.g., [ 12 , 45 , 70 , 96 ].…”
Section: Preliminaries About Pcb Ranking Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%