Identifying rail asset maintenance processes: a human-centric and sensemaking approach

Abstract

Efficient asset maintenance is key for delivering services such as transport. Current rail maintenance processes have been mostly reactive with a recent shift towards exploring proactive modes. The introduction of new ubiquitous technologies and advanced data analytics facilitates the embedding of a 'predict-and-prevent' approach to managing assets. Successful, user-centred integration of such technology is still, however, a sparsely understood area. This study reports results from a set of interviews, based on critical decision method, with rail asset maintenance and management experts regarding current procedural aspects of asset management and maintenance. We analyse and present the results from a human-centric sensemaking timeline perspective. We found that within a complex socio-technical environment such as rail transport, asset maintenance processes apply not only just at local levels, but also at broader, strategic levels that involve different stakeholders and necessitate different levels of expertise. This is a particularly interesting aspect within maintenance that has not been discussed as of yet within a process-based and timeline-based models of asset maintenance. We argue that it is important to consider asset maintenance activities within both micro (local)-and macro (broader)-levels to ensure reliability and stability in transport services. We also propose that the traditionally distinct notions of individual, collaborative and artefact-based sensemaking are in fact all in evidence in this sensemaking context, and argue that a more holistic view of sensemaking is therefore appropriate by placing these results within an amended recognition-primed decision-making model.

Understanding and improving safety in artisanal fishing: A safety-II approach in raft fishing

“…These findings on fishermen's sensemaking are very similar to sensemaking behaviors found in other domains (Baber and McMaster, 2016;Klein et al, 2007;Weick, 1995). During their routine on fish capture expeditions, fishermen continuously monitor if something goes wrong, exchanging different modes of sensemaking (Kefalidou et al, 2018): individual, based on their own assessments and needs; collaborative, based on information coming from other fishermen; and artefact-based, weather bulletins, Lightning, GPS, and Cellphones. It was found that these different sensemaking modes emerge and are combined within the variability of routine (normal) expeditions, when fishermen make sense of an incident situation.…”

A Proactive Decision-Making Model for Evaluating the Reliability of Infrastructure Assets of a Railway System

“…Finally, the root cause of failure in some selected subsystems and components of the railway infrastructure assets [14]. The use of reliability-centered maintenance, predictive maintenance programs, and expert-based rail data for the assessment of the root cause of failure, fault detection, and failure diagnosis in railway infrastructure assets is an interesting topic in reliability management studies [15]. Railway infrastructure in general can be classified into the following two assets [16]:…”

Novel approach for validation of innovative modules for railway traffic management systems in a virtual environment

“…Recent traffic management applications with different objectives or priorities have been reviewed by Corman et al 1,2 TM problems are usually formulated by different mathematical models and solved with various advanced algorithms. Past research includes various TMS for freight rail, 3 passenger rail, [4][5][6] urban rail transit system 7,8 whose objectives are mainly improving the efficiency of multiple aspects of railway operations directly associated with the TMS, and intelligent maintenance system covering the maintenance of railway track, 9 railway asset, 10 entire railway infrastructure, 11 etc., which also minimise the cost of operating the railway and ensure stable daily services.…”