2020
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: New Perspectives

Abstract: The identification of progression in multiple sclerosis is typically retrospective. Given the profound burden of progressive multiple sclerosis, and the recent development of effective treatments for these patients, there is a need to establish measures capable of identifying progressive multiple sclerosis early in the disease course. Starting from recent pathological findings, this review assesses the state of the art of potential measures able to predict progressive multiple sclerosis. Future promising bioma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An der Etablierung von Biomarkern für den Übergang in die sekundäre Progredienz wird intensiv gearbeitet [18]. Die schleichende Krankheitsprogression ist im konventionellen MRT derzeit schwer darstellbar [2].…”
Section: Surrogatmarkerunclassified
“…An der Etablierung von Biomarkern für den Übergang in die sekundäre Progredienz wird intensiv gearbeitet [18]. Die schleichende Krankheitsprogression ist im konventionellen MRT derzeit schwer darstellbar [2].…”
Section: Surrogatmarkerunclassified
“…However, in the setting of MS, even though certain biomarkers suggest differences in the profiles of RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS patients, there is still not enough pathological evidence of clear differences between each disease phenotype (10). The only difference related to structural markers seems so far to be more at a quantitative than qualitative level (11). The neuroand immunopathological structural changes are apparently common in all MS subtypes with individual differences of their contribution to the clinical phenotype rather due to the burden of these lesions than to different pathological characteristics (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only difference related to structural markers seems so far to be more at a quantitative than qualitative level (11). The neuroand immunopathological structural changes are apparently common in all MS subtypes with individual differences of their contribution to the clinical phenotype rather due to the burden of these lesions than to different pathological characteristics (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Bodily systems in which MS progression can be detected continue to be elucidated. 6 Lublin et al suggest using "worsening" rather than "progressing" for patients with relapsing MS, reserving "progression" for those with clinically defined progressive disease 2 -a recommendation adopted here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%