Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change

Abstract

Aim The dimensions of species vulnerability to climate change are complex, and this impedes efforts to provide clear advice for conservation planning. In this study, we used a formal framework to assess species vulnerability to climate change quantifying exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity and then used this information to target areas for reducing vulnerability at a regional scale. Location The 6500‐km2 Mount Lofty Ranges region in South Australia. Methods We quantified the vulnerability of 171 plant species in a fragmented yet biologically important agro‐ecological landscape, typical of many temperate zones globally. We specified exposure, using three climate change scenarios; sensitivity, as the adverse impact of climate change on species’ spatial distribution; and adaptive capacity, as the ability of species to migrate calculated using dispersal kernels. Priority areas for reducing vulnerability were then identified by incorporating these various components into a single priority index. Results Climate change had a variable impact on species distributions. Those species whose range decreased or shifted geographically were attributed higher sensitivity than those species that increased geographic range or remained unchanged. The ability to adapt to range changes in response to shifting climates varies both spatially and between species. Areas of highest priority for reducing vulnerability were found at higher altitudes and lower latitudes with increasing severity of climate change. Main conclusions Our study demonstrates the use of a single spatially explicit index that identifies areas in the landscape for targeting specific conservation and restoration actions to reduce species vulnerability to climate change. Our index can be transferred to other regions around the world in which climate change poses an increasing threat to native species.

Continental-Scale Assessment of Risk to the Australian Odonata from Climate Change

“…The score for all streams was the sum of habitat suitability weighted by the sensitivity weighting for that species in each scenario [78]. Thus, subcatchments scored highly if they contained suitable habitat for many vulnerable species, or for species that had experienced major declines in habitat suitability elsewhere.…”

Hierarchical responses of plant–soil interactions to climate change: consequences for the global carbon cycle

“…There have been numerous discussions of these changes in the context of species conservation (Abeli et al . ; Crossman, Bryan & Summers ), disease spread (Coakley, Scherm & Chakraborty ; Bradley, Gilbert & Martiny ) and pest management (Thomson, Macfadyen & Hoffmann ; Ziska et al . ).…”

Change in agricultural land use constrains adaptation of national wildlife refuges to climate change

“…These tools include increasing the connectivity among protected areas, mitigating threats such as pollution and invasive species, interagency coordination, and the promotion of conservation biology concepts, such as increasing reserve size or improving representation in protected area networks (Heller & Zavaleta 2009). The ultimate goal of these activities is to reduce the vulnerability of native species to threats from changing land use and climate (Crossman et al 2012).…”