“…Table 3. Ethical, legal, practical and clinical considerations when allocating ICU care ventilator treatment What to consider in ensuring fair rationing of resources Ethical, legal and practical considerations • Make triage policy and rationing criteria transparent to staff and the public to ensure understanding of the reasons for access restrictions [2,15,79,80] • Establish local/regional partnerships to effectively manage resource shortages and triage pathways [2,15,75,80] • When resources cannot be maintained, unequal treatment may be justified and choice determined on the basis of medical need and likely benefit[12] by using a proportionately lower amount of resources [81] • People making decisions about resource allocation should not be the treating clinicians but preferably a central triage committee of senior clinicians and legal officers [15,79,86] • First come first served or lottery/ random assignment if two patients with same level of risk present at the same time [81] • Decision-makers should not be aware of patients' identity [19] • Revise existing laws and develop liability protection for clinicians using scoring systems for decisionmaking about allocation of scarce resources [15,29] • Priority to be given to those who have had less opportunity to live their lives [2,29] • Align patients values and preferences with decisions to admit or remain in ICU [87] • [3]. For patients on mechanical ventilation for 14+ days, clinicians should have a discussion with the family about the poor prognosis and goals of care [39] • Refer to palliative care from ED if risk of death is very high (i.e.…”