2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2017.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying priorities to improve paediatric in-hospital antimicrobial use by cross-sectional evaluation of prevalence and appropriateness of prescription

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10,[27][28][29][30] However, positive results of CMV-PCR in CSF (CSF-CMV-PCR) in infants with symptomatic cCMV have not been frequently reported. 18,31 The role of abnormal findings in CSF as markers of brain damage and predictors of neurologic sequelae is still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate a diagnostic value of the positive results of CSF-CMV-PCR in newborns with cCMV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10,[27][28][29][30] However, positive results of CMV-PCR in CSF (CSF-CMV-PCR) in infants with symptomatic cCMV have not been frequently reported. 18,31 The role of abnormal findings in CSF as markers of brain damage and predictors of neurologic sequelae is still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate a diagnostic value of the positive results of CSF-CMV-PCR in newborns with cCMV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our ASP was able to evaluate over 50% of all prescriptions within the recommended timeframe of 48-72 h after the initial prescription [3,37]. As previously described [38,39], the most frequent reason for a prescription being considered nonoptimal was excessive duration of treatment. In our case, this was especially striking in phlegmonous appendicitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several reports around the world identified a high rate of inappropriate antimicrobial prescription (15,16). The main problems identified are an unnecessary indication, wrong antibiotics chosen, wrong directions, incorrect posology, prolonged prescrip- tions, and the use of agents with an excessively broad coverage spectrum (17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%