2019
DOI: 10.1111/jmcb.12675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Price Reviews by Firms: An Econometric Approach

Abstract: Price reviews are a potentially costly activity. A significant fraction of unchanged prices may stem from firms not reviewing prices, rather than from obstacles to changing prices per se, such as menu costs. In this paper, we disentangle these two causes of price stickiness by estimating an inflated ordered probit model on a panel of French manufacturing firms. The results point to a low frequency of price reviews, suggestive of the relevance of information costs as a determinant of the observed price stickine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another source of information on firms' price-setting behaviour are monthly business surveys, which usually collect qualitative variables on price changes and expected price changes on a monthly basis. Several studies have used this type of data to document new findings on how producer prices adjust to shock (Loupias and Sevestre, 2013, for France) or to document patterns of price stickiness (Andrade et al, 2022, and Harris et al, 2020, for France, Bachmann et al, 2019, for Germany and Lein, 2010. One difficulty with this type of survey data is that they usually contain no quantitative information, so it is not straightforward to obtain information from them on individual price changes, which is useful for theoretical models.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another source of information on firms' price-setting behaviour are monthly business surveys, which usually collect qualitative variables on price changes and expected price changes on a monthly basis. Several studies have used this type of data to document new findings on how producer prices adjust to shock (Loupias and Sevestre, 2013, for France) or to document patterns of price stickiness (Andrade et al, 2022, and Harris et al, 2020, for France, Bachmann et al, 2019, for Germany and Lein, 2010. One difficulty with this type of survey data is that they usually contain no quantitative information, so it is not straightforward to obtain information from them on individual price changes, which is useful for theoretical models.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loupias and Sevestre (2013) andHarris et al (2020) have documented several facts on price stickiness using these survey data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%