2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying power elites—k-cores in heterogeneous affiliation networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of different techniques can be used for identifying core-periphery structures within networks, 62 however, we opt for a method that has recently been deployed to the study of economic elites, as this is closer to the other kinds of networks that have been used for other core-periphery analyses, such as the world wide web, transportation networks, or networks of proteins or cells, for example. 63 We use the technique of Larsen and Ellersgaard (2017) to define a core based on minimal distance paths from each node to each other node, generating a "coreness" score. 64 We take those organizations as being one standard deviation above the mean of this score of "coreness" to indicate being in the core, which we record as a 1, and 0 for not being in the core and thus in the periphery.…”
Section: Key Explanatory Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different techniques can be used for identifying core-periphery structures within networks, 62 however, we opt for a method that has recently been deployed to the study of economic elites, as this is closer to the other kinds of networks that have been used for other core-periphery analyses, such as the world wide web, transportation networks, or networks of proteins or cells, for example. 63 We use the technique of Larsen and Ellersgaard (2017) to define a core based on minimal distance paths from each node to each other node, generating a "coreness" score. 64 We take those organizations as being one standard deviation above the mean of this score of "coreness" to indicate being in the core, which we record as a 1, and 0 for not being in the core and thus in the periphery.…”
Section: Key Explanatory Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common for these three approaches is a relatively high vulnerability to more or less ad hoc decisions (Larsen and Ellersgaard 2017). Even the demarcation of a somewhat straightforward group, e.g.…”
Section: Defining the Population An All But Trivial Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions require a reflexive movement back and forth between data and hypotheses, similar to a hermeneutic circle in which qualitative knowledge of the field informs and is informed by data (Bourdieu 2005, 99). We propose here that this process can be further guided and substantiated by systematic use of relational methods (Larsen and Ellersgaard 2017; see also Knoke 1993) using patterns of formal interaction to identify key players at the core of elite networks.…”
Section: Defining the Population An All But Trivial Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As stated in [31], it is still not well understood what the evaluation models for social influence studies are and the research field is still on its preliminary stages. The authors' goal in [32] is to identify top-k influential (or powerful) nodes in a society as a whole. They propose a method for including nodes in the network and gathering data from various data sets, such as top foundations and corporations' executive boards, all in Denmark.…”
Section: Influence Analysis Background From Social Network Analysis Rmentioning
confidence: 99%