Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study

Abstract

Background The United Kingdom (UK) is experiencing a general practitioner (GP) workforce retention crisis. Research has focused on investigating why GPs intend to quit, but less is known about the acceptability and effectiveness of policies and strategies to improve GP retention. Using evidence from research and key stakeholder organisations, we generated a set of potential policies and strategies aimed at maximising GP retention and tested their appropriateness for implementation by systematically consulting with GPs. Methods 28 GP Partners and GPs working in national stakeholder organisations from South West England and London were purposively sampled, and asked to take part in a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method panel. Panellists were asked to read an evidence briefing summary, and then complete an online survey on two occasions. During each round, participants rated the appropriateness of policies and strategies aimed at improving GP retention using a nine point scale (1 ‘extremely inappropriate’ to 9 ‘extremely appropriate’). Fifty-four potential policies and strategies (equating to 100 statements) were tested, focusing on factors influencing job satisfaction (e.g. well-being, workload, incentives and remuneration, flexible working, human resources systems). Ratings were analysed for panel consensus and categorised based on appropriateness (‘appropriate’, ‘uncertain’, ‘inappropriate’). Results 12/28 GPs approached agreed to take part, 9/28 completed two rounds of the online survey between February and June 2018. Panellists identified 24/54 policy and strategy areas (41/100 statements) as ‘appropriate’. Examples included providing GP practices ‘at risk’ of experiencing GP shortages with a toolkit for managing recruitment and retention, and interventions to facilitate peer support to enhance health and wellbeing, or support portfolio careers. Strategies to limit GP workload, and manage patient demand were also endorsed. Conclusions The panel of experienced GPs identified a number of practical ways to improve GP retention through interventions that might enhance job satisfaction and work-life balance. Future research should evaluate the impact of implementing these recommendations.

Leadership mindset regarding talent management practices: A case study of the City of Windhoek Council

“…According to Chilvers et al (2019), retention strategies are policies and plans that organisations follow to satisfy the diverse needs of employees and create an environment that encourages people to stay in the organisation. Talent management is a human resource doctrine that holds that the employee is not merely a means to achieve organisational objectives but an organisational asset, hence the term human capital.…”

“…The essence of the commitment-based approach is to draw out employee commitment, which in turn will produce both better organisational performance and greater human development. Chilvers et al (2019) highlighted the importance of talent retention by saying that effective talent management and retention is a continuation process, and it must be the part of the organisational culture. This study, therefore, sought to determine how best talent can be retained, despite the development process that may render this talent more attractive to other competing organisations.…”

Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019

“… 32 Recently, the ReGROUP project concluded that policies and strategies to address the existing healthcare workforce crisis in primary care and maximise retention of GPs should facilitate sustainable GP workload and contractual requirements, as well as the need for personal and professional support; in addition to target areas which influence job satisfaction and work-life balance. 33 …”

Community health workers' mobility in China: Evidence from 2008 to 2017

“…For example, measures of the US government are devoted to areas where health services are weak, such as providing special fund support for the internship of rural family physicians, enacting a policy of tuition-free medical students in rural areas and ensuring that the wage level of rural CHWs is not lower than the minimum income standard, and urban and rural counterpart assistance ( 17 ). The Health Service System in the United Kingdom is considered one of the best medical service systems in the world for the implementation of general practitioner system and the government's planning of community health services ( 17 ). Zhu found that the autonomy of institutions and fiscal measures perform an active role in the attraction and retention of rural CHWs in Cambodia, China and Vietnam ( 18 ).…”