Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2009916.2010034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying points of interest by self-tuning clustering

Abstract: Deducing trip related information from web-scale datasets has received very large amounts of attention recently. Identifying points of interest (POIs) in geo-tagged photos is one of these problems. The problem can be viewed as a standard clustering problem of partitioning two dimensional objects. In this work, we study spectral clustering which is the first attempt for the POIs identification. However, there is no unified approach to assign the clustering parameters; especially the features of POIs are immense… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crandall et al [5], Yang et al [6], and Zhou et al [7] propose methods for extracting landmarks by clustering locations where photos are taken based on data from Flickr. Wei et al [8] propose a method to construct popular routes from uncertain trajectories on the basis of data obtained from Foursquare.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crandall et al [5], Yang et al [6], and Zhou et al [7] propose methods for extracting landmarks by clustering locations where photos are taken based on data from Flickr. Wei et al [8] propose a method to construct popular routes from uncertain trajectories on the basis of data obtained from Foursquare.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies attempt to research tourist mobility based on geotagged social media data; for example, the extraction of the locations of popular touristic sites [5][6][7], the extraction of popular routes for tourists [8], and recommendations of touristic sites and routes [9][10][11]. Other studies compare inbound tourist mobility and domestic tourist mobility [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another more popular spatial clustering method is the DBSCAN (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) algorithm, which has the advantage of requiring less field knowledge and enables finding irregularly-shaped clusters [12]; Kisilevich et al introduced an adaptive density-based clustering method named P-DBSCAN [13], which is designed on the basis of the DBSCAN algorithm. Moreover, Yang used a spectral clustering method in attraction mining [14,15]; the advantage of this method is that the number of clusters can automatically be adjusted. Zheng and Yuan studied how to mine points of interest and popular attractions using GPS trajectory data and proposed a hierarchical algorithm [16][17][18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in [16], GeoSR is presented as a way of measuring the semantic relatedness of Wikipedia articles based on their geographic context, allowing users to explore information in Wikipedia that is relevant to a particular location. In [41], one would like to discover points of interests based on geotagged photos by applying a form of spectral clustering. The problem with this approach is that there is no unified way for determining the appropriate parameters for the clustering algorithm.…”
Section: Using Locations Of Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%