1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001340050486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying patients with ARDS: time for a different approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…high-permeability lung edema, in its definition, as previously suggested. 30 In fact, it is surprising that in about half of the patients currently considered as affects by ALI/ ARDS, as defined by the American-European Consensus Conference, the amount of collapsed lung tissue, which is strictly related to the formation of gravity-dependent lung edema, is almost negligible, and, even more, very similar to that observed in patients with unilateral pneumonia, which, by definition, are not included into the ALI/ARDS definition.…”
Section: Ct-scanning and Ards Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…high-permeability lung edema, in its definition, as previously suggested. 30 In fact, it is surprising that in about half of the patients currently considered as affects by ALI/ ARDS, as defined by the American-European Consensus Conference, the amount of collapsed lung tissue, which is strictly related to the formation of gravity-dependent lung edema, is almost negligible, and, even more, very similar to that observed in patients with unilateral pneumonia, which, by definition, are not included into the ALI/ARDS definition.…”
Section: Ct-scanning and Ards Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of acute lung injury (ALI), especially for the purpose of identifying appropriate patients for clinical trials of novel treatments, remains a controversial and important problem [1,2,3,4,5]. At present the diagnosis of ALI (or the putatively more severe form of the acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS) depends entirely on a set of readily obtained but clearly nonspecific clinical criteria, collectively known as the AmericanEuropean Consensus Conference (AECC) criteria [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present the diagnosis of ALI (or the putatively more severe form of the acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS) depends entirely on a set of readily obtained but clearly nonspecific clinical criteria, collectively known as the AmericanEuropean Consensus Conference (AECC) criteria [6]. The value of these criteria has been challenged [2,3,4,5], but in the absence of some evidence-based alternative the AECC criteria continue to be used, almost universally, to establish inclusion criteria for ALI/ARDS clinical trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the ARDS is defined as the condition detected in patients who have higher lung recruitability, the extraordinary potential of CT analysis in defining ARDS is immediately apparent. The notion that lung edema or lung capillary permeability should be a cornerstone of the definition of ARDS is not novel [24,25], but, unfortunately, it has been ignored for long time, probably because of the technical difficulties associated with its assessment. The authors believe that two CT scans are required for ARDS diagnosis, one taken at end-expiration at low pressure level, and one taken at end-inspiration at a higher pressure level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%