2019
DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190065
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Ontario geographic regions to assess adults who present to hospital with laboratory-defined conditions: a descriptive study

Abstract: Background: In 2007, an electronic repository called the Ontario Laboratories Information System (OLIS) was introduced to allow health care providers timely access to laboratory test results. Since not all laboratories began submitting their data to OLIS simultaneously, we sought to create a date-dependent table of geographic regions (forward sortation areas [FSAs]) from which people would likely present to a hospital linked to OLIS. Methods: In this descriptive study, we used administrative data to capture ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study participants were assigned to geographic hospital catchment areas with corresponding linked laboratory data, using previously published methods. 29 We included only Ontarians who resided within these catchment areas to ensure accurate ascertainment of outcomes, as not all hospital-based laboratories started contributing to Ontario Laboratories Information System (OLIS) at the same time and, to date, not all are contributing.…”
Section: Sources Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Study participants were assigned to geographic hospital catchment areas with corresponding linked laboratory data, using previously published methods. 29 We included only Ontarians who resided within these catchment areas to ensure accurate ascertainment of outcomes, as not all hospital-based laboratories started contributing to Ontario Laboratories Information System (OLIS) at the same time and, to date, not all are contributing.…”
Section: Sources Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ascertain outcomes accurately for participants in our cohort, we ensured that participants resided within areas serviced by OLIS, so that they would receive serum creatinine tests in hospitals captured in our data source. 29 In terms of accuracy and completeness, OLIS values for serum creatinine levels are preferable compared with diagnostic codes, and once a hospital begins contributing to OLIS, the database should have complete capture of all test results. For baseline serum creatinine measurement, we selected an outpatient value (measured by outpatient community or hospital laboratories) within the past year that was closest to their index date.…”
Section: Sources Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the OGCT is offered to all pregnant women and screening rates are high in Canada [ 49 ], missing data in this variable should predominantly relate to whether the attending site was contributing submissions to OLIS. Given that evidence suggests no differences in characteristics of people attending OLIS contributing and non-contributing sites [ 50 ], it may be reasonable to assume that these data are missing completely at random, in which case multiple imputation is an appropriate missing data handling approach [ 41 ]. However, exploratory analyses will be undertaken to determine whether OGCT values can be reasonably imputed using available data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…creatinine and HbA1c) for provincial laboratories within the OLIS catchment area. 21 A list of our coding definitions is included in Table S2.…”
Section: Additional Databases Included the Canadian Institute For Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%