2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying objective criterion to determine a complicated task – A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between complexity and operator performance has been addressed in multiple studies in the past (Campbell, 1991;Chan, Song, & Yao, 2015;Park & Jung, 2015). Task complexity has been found to have a profound effect on task performance (Topi, Valacich, & Hoffer, 2005).…”
Section: Task Level Complexities In Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between complexity and operator performance has been addressed in multiple studies in the past (Campbell, 1991;Chan, Song, & Yao, 2015;Park & Jung, 2015). Task complexity has been found to have a profound effect on task performance (Topi, Valacich, & Hoffer, 2005).…”
Section: Task Level Complexities In Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also show that step complexity metrics and sentiment may also play a substantial role in procedure step performance. Although there has been some previous research investigating the relationships between complexity and performance (Campbell, 1991; Chan et al, 2015; Park & Jung, 2015), the findings regarding the relationship between a type of complexity, worker experience, and attributes of the procedure design are novel and need to be pursued further to be more clearly understood. Similarly, the significance of the sentiment findings must be explored further in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the task component, we referred to Park and Jung's study (2015) and chose five indicators (large amounts of information, large number of steps, complex logic within steps, need for broad knowledge, and high decision levels) to reflect the task complexity because during the interview, participants affirmed the influence of task complexity but did not provide sufficiently detailed indicators to characterize the complexity of commissioning tasks. Park and Jung's study (2015) aimed at developing an objective criterion for assessing the task complexity, and the complexity scores calculated by these five indicators showed a significant correlation with the scores of subjective scaling. Note that many PSF sets include the PSF “time pressure,” but our PSF framework does not contain it as a PSF factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task 8.1. Task complexity Indicators for task complexity were originally borrowed from Park and Jung (2015), and five indicators were chosen to reflect how effort demanding a task is for a staff to perform.…”
Section: Content Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%