2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Nursing Home Residents with Unmet Palliative Care Needs: A Systematic Review of Screening Tool Measurement Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the quality of evidence about NECPAL was rated as low, which is consistent with findings of previous reviews. 20 22 The quality of evidence regarding the content validity of SPICT was rated as 'moderate' in this review, but was rated as very low by Teike's review. 20 One possible reason for this discrepancy is that we included the validation studies of all versions of SPICT, but Teike's review only included the development study of the original version of SPICT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the quality of evidence about NECPAL was rated as low, which is consistent with findings of previous reviews. 20 22 The quality of evidence regarding the content validity of SPICT was rated as 'moderate' in this review, but was rated as very low by Teike's review. 20 One possible reason for this discrepancy is that we included the validation studies of all versions of SPICT, but Teike's review only included the development study of the original version of SPICT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They did not conduct a meta-analysis to pool the clinical performance of the instruments. [19][20][21][22][23] Additionally, existing reviews only included instruments used within a single type of setting, such as primary care settings or hospital settings. 19-21 23 Therefore, it is unclear how screening instruments were used across different settings, and whether variations exist in their clinical performance across these instruments and different settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%