2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1596783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Natural Products (NPs) as potential UPR inhibitors for crop protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the former example, one may wonder if a fractionation step is required before 13 C NMR dereplication of complex mixtures, including compounds exhibiting similar backbones. Thus, in the framework of a project that aimed at discovering new Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) modulators, the same methodology was finally applied to a G. mangostana fruit peel apolar extract together with one chromatography fraction. Mangosteen is well-known to contain bioactive prenylated xanthones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the former example, one may wonder if a fractionation step is required before 13 C NMR dereplication of complex mixtures, including compounds exhibiting similar backbones. Thus, in the framework of a project that aimed at discovering new Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) modulators, the same methodology was finally applied to a G. mangostana fruit peel apolar extract together with one chromatography fraction. Mangosteen is well-known to contain bioactive prenylated xanthones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm that the metabolites predicted by the MixONat software correspond to those present in the analysed sample, the experimental chemical shifts must be compared with spectroscopic data reported in the literature (in the same solvent) for the proposed metabolite; a difference no greater than 0.4 ppm between the experimental and reported data will confirm the identification. 21 The 13 C-NMR dereplication analysis of the macluraxanthone (1) rich fraction 1K predicted the presence of pyranoxanthones, ranking blancoxanthone (2) [score: 0.74 (17/23C)] and jacareubin (3) [score: 0.72 (13/18C)] in the first and second positions, with macluraxanthone (1) [score: 0.65 (15/23C)] appearing in the third position when using a Calophyllum DB (Figure S8), and in the sixth position when using Xanthones DB (Figure S9). These results can be expected when taking into account the similarities in the chemical structures of the xanthones 1, 2, and 3 (Figure 1); however, comparing the experimental chemical shifts with those reported for 1, 24,25 2, 25 and 3 45 in the literature (Table S2) confirmed the identification of macluraxanthone (1) as the major component in fraction 1K…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%