2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying key parameters in a novel multistep bio-ecological wastewater treatment process for rural areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to these high-rate anaerobic reactors, the anaerobic filters (AFs) have drawn attention because of the following advantages [13][14][15]: (1) simple design configuration with low capital and operating costs, (2) excellent capability of high biomass retention with carriers, (3) stable operation, (4) greater tolerance to hydraulic loading rate and organic loading rate, and (5) low footprint. The potential of using AFs for treating wastewater have been well developed not only for industrial wastewater, but also for domestic wastewater [5,[16][17][18]. However, most of these studies focused on the effects of carriers, hydraulic retention time (HRT), and organic loading rate on the performance of AFs, and there were a few studies that focused on the effects of seasonal temperature [5,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to these high-rate anaerobic reactors, the anaerobic filters (AFs) have drawn attention because of the following advantages [13][14][15]: (1) simple design configuration with low capital and operating costs, (2) excellent capability of high biomass retention with carriers, (3) stable operation, (4) greater tolerance to hydraulic loading rate and organic loading rate, and (5) low footprint. The potential of using AFs for treating wastewater have been well developed not only for industrial wastewater, but also for domestic wastewater [5,[16][17][18]. However, most of these studies focused on the effects of carriers, hydraulic retention time (HRT), and organic loading rate on the performance of AFs, and there were a few studies that focused on the effects of seasonal temperature [5,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centralized wastewater treatment plants used for municipal wastewater treatment are usually not suitable for rural wastewater treatment due to the dispersed rural population and construction costs of sewage collectors (Wang et al 2011a;Ye and Li 2009). By contrast, decentralized systems are preferable for the treatment of widely distributed rural domestic wastewaters with advantages such as high removal efficiency of pollutants, low costs, and easy maintenance (Wu et al 2013b). Some on-site independent processes for decentralized sewage treatment, such as absorbent biofilter (Kwun et al 2000), constructed wetlands (Wu et al 2002;Yu et al 2012), high-rate algal ponds (Evans et al 2005), and septic tanks (Liang et al 2009), have been developed and applied in rural areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That may be attributed to the energy recovery and low sludge production in anaerobic bioreactors [1][2][3]. Despite of these advantages, anaerobic techniques are not widely adopted due to the lack of nitrogen removal capability [4][5][6][7]. Even though nitrogen is one of the important nutrients for agriculture and landscaping irrigation reuse [8], nitrogen also plays a major role in oxygen depletion and eutrophication in the receiving water bodies [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, more and more attention has been focused on the treatment of decentralized domestic wastewater by anaerobic techniques in developing countries, particularly in the rural areas of China [1][2][3][4]. That may be attributed to the energy recovery and low sludge production in anaerobic bioreactors [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%