2017
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhx133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Information Asymmetry in Securities Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disagreement among investor in the same group (dealer or customer) and/ or disagreement between dealer groups and customer groups create a different market position for each investor and make yield swing from one extreme position to other extremes (O'Hara, 2003) Each investor's peculiar investment horizon drives to a different information set. Different information creates a different trading position in the market (Back, Crotty, & Li, 2018). There are many research which investigates how price discovery process affects bond yield volatility.…”
Section: Buddi Wibowomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disagreement among investor in the same group (dealer or customer) and/ or disagreement between dealer groups and customer groups create a different market position for each investor and make yield swing from one extreme position to other extremes (O'Hara, 2003) Each investor's peculiar investment horizon drives to a different information set. Different information creates a different trading position in the market (Back, Crotty, & Li, 2018). There are many research which investigates how price discovery process affects bond yield volatility.…”
Section: Buddi Wibowomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gauge the precision of our measures in this context, we repeat the simulation analysis while allowing the proportion of informed trade η to be random across observations. This version of our model can be interpreted as a hybrid of our Kyle (1985)-type model in Section 2 and the PIN model by Easley et al (1996), in which arrival of information is random, similar to Back et al (2017). Panel B of 2 reports simulation results for the case where the number of uninformed liquidity seekers is fixed at 1,000, while the number of informed liquidity seekers is in each of the T = 100 trading sessions randomly drawn from a Binomial distribution.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is related to problems such as numerical overflow and so-called time-horizon issues which arise in the estimation of PIN (e.g., see Easley, Engle, O'Hara, and Wu, 2008;Tay, Ting, Tse, and Warachka, 2009;Lin and Ke, 2011). The third is related to the bias in the theoretical underpinnings of PIN (e.g., see Collin-Dufresne and Fos, 2015; Duarte et al, 2015;Back, Crotty, and Li, 2016).…”
Section: Psos and Difference Of Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%