2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying influential spreaders by weight degree centrality in complex networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following experiments, the KLD index will be compared with six evaluation indices, such as the clustering coefficient [35] (labeled as the C index), the extended neighborhood coreness centrality [15] (labeled as the C nc+ index), the weight degree centrality method (labeled as the W DC index), the extended weight degree centrality method [12] (labeled as the EW DC index), the extended gravity method [16] (labeled as the G + index), and the semi-local centrality method [11] (labeled as the SL index). Here, we briefly review the definitions of the six indices that will be discussed in this work in Table 2.…”
Section: Contrast Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following experiments, the KLD index will be compared with six evaluation indices, such as the clustering coefficient [35] (labeled as the C index), the extended neighborhood coreness centrality [15] (labeled as the C nc+ index), the weight degree centrality method (labeled as the W DC index), the extended weight degree centrality method [12] (labeled as the EW DC index), the extended gravity method [16] (labeled as the G + index), and the semi-local centrality method [11] (labeled as the SL index). Here, we briefly review the definitions of the six indices that will be discussed in this work in Table 2.…”
Section: Contrast Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It achieves a good balance between accuracy and time complexity of the algorithm. Liu et al [12] proposed a weight degree centrality method that consists of the degree of a node and its neighborhoods, and this method worked well in most experiments. Kitsak et al [13] believed that the node importance was related to the location of the network, and they proposed a k-shell decomposition method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been proposed to measure influence of nodes in the network, such as degree, betweenness, closeness and so on. As we know, degree [20], closeness [1], betweenness [24] and pagerank [14] are proposed to represent node influence in the network. However, many methods only consider node local attributes and ignores that nodes are also related to global properties of the network.…”
Section: A Influence Of Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neighborhood coreness is labeled as + ( ) and + ( ) denotes the extended neighborhood coreness, which is the second-order neighborhood coreness. Liu et al [36] proposed a weight degree centrality (labeled as ) to measure the influence of node propagation and regulate the weight between the degree and the ability of spreading out with a tuning parameter . And the extended weight degree centrality method is labeled as .…”
Section: Contrast Centrality Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%