2018
DOI: 10.1080/00295639.2018.1429173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Inconsistencies in Fission Product Yield Evaluations with Prompt Neutron Emission

Abstract: We present a self-consistency analysis of fission product yield evaluations. Anomalous yields are determined using a series of simple conservation checks and comparing charge distributions with common parameterizations. The total prompt neutron multiplicity as a function of product massνT (A) is derived directly from the independent fission product yields using average charge conservation. This method is checked against Monte Carlo simulations of the de-excitation of the fission fragments in a Hauser-Feshbach … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, there is little to no consistency between the various types of fission nuclear data in our evaluated libraries [1]. However, we know that these observables are correlated through the fission process that produces all of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Historically, there is little to no consistency between the various types of fission nuclear data in our evaluated libraries [1]. However, we know that these observables are correlated through the fission process that produces all of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From there, the models ei- * e-mail: lovell@lanl.gov ther perform a Monte Carlo sampling of the fission fragment initial conditions and de-excite the fission fragments or deterministically de-excite the fragments. This type of consistent modeling of prompt and/or delayed neutron and γ-ray observables aims to solve the problem of discrepancies between evaluated quantities [20] caused by the use of independent modeling for quantities that are inherently linked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models used for the calculation and evaluation of quantities relevant to applications, such as reactor design, understanding detector response in nuclear physics measurements [17,18], or stockpile stewardship, are independent of one another so there is no connection between the fission product yields (FPYs), multiplicity distribu-tions, or energy spectra. This independence has been shown to cause discrepancies between evaluated quantities [19]. Thus, a great investment has been made into developing models that can calculate these quantities consistently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%