2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-019-09733-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying gameplay videos that exhibit bugs in computer games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yu et al [317] initially focused on defect prediction for concurrent programs and proposed ConPredictor, a prototype tool that used four classiication techniques to identify defects by applying a set of static and dynamic code metrics based on unique features of concurrent programs. Lin et al [142] present an approach to identifying buggy videos from a set of gameplay videos. They applied three classiication models ś logistic regression, neural network and random forests ś to determine the probability that a video showcases a bug.…”
Section: Sotware Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yu et al [317] initially focused on defect prediction for concurrent programs and proposed ConPredictor, a prototype tool that used four classiication techniques to identify defects by applying a set of static and dynamic code metrics based on unique features of concurrent programs. Lin et al [142] present an approach to identifying buggy videos from a set of gameplay videos. They applied three classiication models ś logistic regression, neural network and random forests ś to determine the probability that a video showcases a bug.…”
Section: Sotware Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key reasons are usually to save developer time and efort and to improve the software quality in terms of stability, reliability, and security. Many of such studies have resulted in great improvements in various tasks [24,142,233,240,267,326].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To statistically compare the interpretation consistency in different performance groups, we perform the Wilcoxon Rank Sum (WRS) test. The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test is an unpaired, non- parametric test commonly used in literature [15,45,46], of which the null hypothesis is that for randomly selected values X and Y from two distributions, the probability of X being greater than Y is equal to the probability of Y being greater than X. In this RQ, to confirm if the interpretation consistency of group X is statistically significantly higher than group Y, we use a one-sided alternative hypothesis of X being shifted to the right of Y.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Forest is an ensemble classification-based algorithm that contains a set of decision trees. These decision trees give classifications and are created from data samples that decide which classification has the most votes [70]. Then, the algorithm selects the trees that give the best prediction result.…”
Section: ) Random Forest Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%