Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2567948.2578996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying fraudulently promoted online videos

Abstract: Fraudulent product promotion online, including online videos, is on the rise. In order to understand and defend against this ill, we engage in the fraudulent video economy for a popular video sharing website, YouTube, and collect a sample of over 3,300 fraudulently promoted videos and 500 bot profiles that promote them. We then characterize fraudulent videos and profiles and train supervised machine learning classifiers that can successfully differentiate fraudulent videos and profiles from legitimate ones.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Sureka 2011) focuses on both user features and comment activity logs to propose formulas/rules that can accurately detect spamming YouTube users. Using similar features, (Bulakh, Dunn, and Gupta 2014) characterize and identify fraudulently promoted YouTube videos. (Chaudhary and Sureka 2013) use only video features, and propose a one-class classifier approach for detecting spam videos.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Sureka 2011) focuses on both user features and comment activity logs to propose formulas/rules that can accurately detect spamming YouTube users. Using similar features, (Bulakh, Dunn, and Gupta 2014) characterize and identify fraudulently promoted YouTube videos. (Chaudhary and Sureka 2013) use only video features, and propose a one-class classifier approach for detecting spam videos.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for each channel we collect all their videos, hence acquiring a set of 181 additional seed videos; 2) we create a list of 83 keywords 8 by extracting n-grams from the title of videos posted on /r/fullcartoonsonyoutube. Similar to the previous approach, for each keyword, we obtain the first 30 videos as returned by the YouTube's Data API search functionality, hence acquiring another 2,342 seed videos; 3) to obtain a random sample of videos, we use the Random YouTube API 9 , which provides random YouTube video identifiers which we then download using the YouTube Data API. This approach resulted in the acquisition of 8,391 seed random videos; and 4) we also collect the most popular videos in the USA, the UK, Russia, India, and Canada, between November 18 and November 21, 2018, hence acquiring another 500 seed videos.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study [32] focuses on both user features and comment activity logs to propose formulas/rules that can accurately detect spamming YouTube users. Using similar features, [9] characterize and identify fraudulently promoted YouTube videos. [11] use only video features, and propose a one-class classifier approach for detecting spam videos.…”
Section: Recommendation Graph Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [12] in which measurement studies were performed to distinguish fraudulent promoters from legitimate users which was followed by development of supervised machine learning models to differentiate legitimate users from those indulging in fraudulent promotion. Spam campaigns in YouTube is another interesting problem studied by Callaghan et.…”
Section: B Detection Of Malicious User Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%