2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying forensically relevant urban scavengers in Johannesburg, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the same reason, multiple carcasses were not used at each site, even though this would increase the statistical validity of the data. While multiple carcasses are sometimes used in scavenging studies to ensure reliable trends can be reported [24, 28, 35], the use of multiple carcasses at our sites would have increased the likelihood of individual scavengers feeding on multiple carcasses, and thus reduced their feeding behavior at a single carcass as would occur in a natural scavenging environment (and also in a forensic context). Additionally, the nutrient pulse produced by multiple carrion could change the structure and composition of the scavenger guilds at a local scale [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the same reason, multiple carcasses were not used at each site, even though this would increase the statistical validity of the data. While multiple carcasses are sometimes used in scavenging studies to ensure reliable trends can be reported [24, 28, 35], the use of multiple carcasses at our sites would have increased the likelihood of individual scavengers feeding on multiple carcasses, and thus reduced their feeding behavior at a single carcass as would occur in a natural scavenging environment (and also in a forensic context). Additionally, the nutrient pulse produced by multiple carrion could change the structure and composition of the scavenger guilds at a local scale [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When conditions are optimal, such as when other competing scavengers are less present (e.g., as a result of bird migration or fenced study sites), small mammals have been reported as prevalent scavengers in forensically relevant studies. These include the Cape gray ( Herpestes pulverulentus ), slender ( Galerella sanguinea ), and banded ( Mungos mungo ) mongoose in South Africa [9–11, 28, 35], the red fox ( V. vulpes ) and Eurasian badger ( Meles meles ) in the United Kingdom [8], along with the Virginia opossum ( Didelphis virginiana ) [2, 3], northern raccoon ( P. lotor ) [2, 20], bobcat ( Lynx rufus ) [5], and striped skunk ( M. mephitis ) [2, 25] in North America. Such information is important for interpreting soft and hard tissue loss in forensic death investigations, particularly when such scavengers are either unknown for a biogeoclimatic region, or are not presumed to be the dominant scavenger for the region where human remains are discovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the Cape gray mongoose was the only observed scavenger, this was not unexpected; exclusive scavenging by this species has been noted in this area before [4, 13–15, 46]. This mongoose, along with other species, has also been documented in other South African contexts [24, 47–49]. The single carcasses experienced more mongoose scavenging than the multiple carcasses for each season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…African contexts [24,[47][48][49]. The single carcasses experienced more mongoose scavenging than the multiple carcasses for each season.…”
Section: Scavengingmentioning
confidence: 99%