2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying flow defects in amorphous alloys using machine learning outlier detection methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[142][143][144] Except for the energy related materials, so far, machine learning models and predictions have been utilized for accelerating the invention and research processes of amorphous and disordered materials of metallic glasses, 145,146 such as Co-V-Zr 147 and Cu-Zr. 148 As a whole, there are three main modes of applying the machine learning method to glassy material research, including data-driven machine learning, machine learning interatomic potential, and machine learning-driven AIMD simulation.…”
Section: Machine Learning For Materials Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[142][143][144] Except for the energy related materials, so far, machine learning models and predictions have been utilized for accelerating the invention and research processes of amorphous and disordered materials of metallic glasses, 145,146 such as Co-V-Zr 147 and Cu-Zr. 148 As a whole, there are three main modes of applying the machine learning method to glassy material research, including data-driven machine learning, machine learning interatomic potential, and machine learning-driven AIMD simulation.…”
Section: Machine Learning For Materials Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of note that a third route has appeared recently. The emerging machine-learning strategies represent a great advancement in this direction (Cubuk et al, 2015;Schoenholz et al, 2016;Schoenholz et al, 2017;Wang and Jain, 2019;Tian et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021), which have yielded an unprecedented accuracy in predicting local structural features and other dynamics in glasses (Fan et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2021). Despite its advantage in dealing with big data, the machine-learning model usually works as a black box, causing some puzzles in interpreting the datadriven results from a physically relevant perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the advancement of machine learning (ML) algorithms for handling various complex problems with nonlinearity or high dimensionality (Harrington et al, 2019;Tian et al, 2020) has led to STZ prediction studies based on ML algorithms, starting with Cubuk's pioneering study which defined "softness" using a support vector machine with the geometric features of atoms (Cubuk et al, 2015). In this line of studies, the predictive performance of a trained ML model was evaluated by metrics such as the AUC (area under the curve) of ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve or with a probability plot associated with recall (Schoenholz et al, 2016;Cubuk et al, 2017;Wang and Jain, 2019;Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%