Identifying fine‐scale habitat preferences of threatened butterflies using airborne laser scanning

Abstract

Aim Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) is a promising remote sensing technique for ecological applications because it can quantify vegetation structure at high resolution over broad spatial extents. Using country‐wide airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, we test to what extent fine‐scale LiDAR metrics capturing low vegetation, medium‐to‐high vegetation and landscape‐scale habitat structures can explain the habitat preferences of threatened butterflies at a national extent. Location The Netherlands. Methods We applied a machine‐learning (random forest) algorithm to build species distribution models (SDMs) for grassland and woodland butterflies in wet and dry habitats using various LiDAR metrics and butterfly presence–absence data collected by a national butterfly monitoring scheme. The LiDAR metrics captured vertical vegetation complexity (e.g., height and vegetation density of different strata) and horizontal heterogeneity (e.g., vegetation roughness, microtopography, vegetation openness and woodland edge extent). We assessed the relative variable importance and interpreted response curves of each LiDAR metric for explaining butterfly occurrences. Results All SDMs showed a good to excellent fit, with woodland butterfly SDMs performing slightly better than those of grassland butterflies. Grassland butterfly occurrences were best explained by landscape‐scale habitat structures (e.g., open patches, microtopography) and vegetation height. Woodland butterfly occurrences were mainly determined by vegetation density of medium‐to‐high vegetation, open patches and woodland edge extent. The importance of metrics generally differed between wet and dry habitats for both grassland and woodland species. Main conclusions Vertical variability and horizontal heterogeneity of vegetation structure are key determinants of butterfly species distributions, even in low‐stature habitats such as grasslands, dunes and heathlands. The information content of low vegetation LiDAR metrics could further be improved with country‐wide leaf‐on ALS data or surveys from drones and terrestrial laser scanners at specific sites. LiDAR thus offers great potential for predictive habitat distribution modelling and other studies on ecological niches and invertebrate–habitat relationships.

Better together? Assessing different remote sensing products for predicting habitat suitability of wetland birds

“…To derive ecologically relevant information, the obtained 3D point cloud needs to be further processed, for example into metrics which statistically aggregate the 3D point cloud information within raster cells (Bakx et al, 2019; Davies & Asner, 2014). These LiDAR metrics can then be used to model the fine‐scale habitat suitability of animals such as birds, mammals and invertebrates (Davies et al, 2018; de Vries et al, 2021; Zellweger et al, 2013). Even though several studies have successfully used LiDAR metrics for characterizing habitat structure, the ALS data usually come with two major limitations.…”

Habitat conservation state and plant diversity respond to different drivers in semi‐natural grasslands

“…Such actions should be framed in the overall objective of increasing grassland ecological and structural heterogeneity, rather than in changing their overall ecological conditions. For instance, planning litter removal in patches within grasslands may enhance the variability in grassland canopy height (Price et al, 2017) with positive outcomes for bird and butterfly communities (Hovick et al 2015; Vries et al, 2021).…”

Mobile Laser Scanner understory characterization: an exploratory study on hazel grouse in Italian Alps

“…There is a large body of literature concerning the relationship between ALS structural metrics and habitat characterization (Hinsley et al, 2002; BRADBURY et al, 2005; Graf et al, 2009; Melin et al, 2016; Zellweger et al, 2014; Vries et al, 2021).…”