2012
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-457945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying familial myelodysplastic/acute leukemia predisposition syndromes through hematopoietic stem cell transplantation donors with thrombocytopenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first was a 63-year-old donor with mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 136 K/μL) and macrocytosis (MCV, 107.8 fL) whom we had reported previously with a novel deleterious germline TERT mutation (c.2908A>G; p.M970V; 48% allelic ratio), identified in the recipient’s leukemia as well [1]. Mutations in TERT are known to cause an inherited autosomal dominant telomere biology disorder [4], and we demonstrated that all lymphocyte subsets from the donor had short or very short telomeres by flow fluorescein in situ hybridization [1]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first was a 63-year-old donor with mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 136 K/μL) and macrocytosis (MCV, 107.8 fL) whom we had reported previously with a novel deleterious germline TERT mutation (c.2908A>G; p.M970V; 48% allelic ratio), identified in the recipient’s leukemia as well [1]. Mutations in TERT are known to cause an inherited autosomal dominant telomere biology disorder [4], and we demonstrated that all lymphocyte subsets from the donor had short or very short telomeres by flow fluorescein in situ hybridization [1]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, genetic factors contributing to donors who mobilize PBSC poorly, and how this affects transplantation outcomes, are not well understood. Previously, our laboratory identified a case of germline predisposition to myeloid malignancies by studying related allogeneic stem cell donors who had baseline unexplained thrombocytopenia as a marker for identifying familial myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute leukemia predisposition syndromes [1]. Because poor mobilization has been observed in individuals with other heritable hematopoietic disorders [2], we hypothesized that we could identify additional individuals and families at high risk for having a germline predisposition allele by examining related allogeneic HSC donors who mobilized low numbers of PBSCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 28 poor mobilizers sequenced using MarrowSeq (The University of Washington Medical Center Genetics and Solid Tumor Diagnostic Laboratory), clearly damaging mutations were identified in 2 individuals (7%). The first was a 63-year-old donor with mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 136 K/μL) and macrocytosis (MCV, 107.8 fL) whom we had reported previously with a novel deleterious germline TERT mutation (c.2908A>G; p.M970V; 48% allelic ratio), identified in the recipient's leukemia as well [1]. Mutations in TERT are known to cause an inherited autosomal dominant telomere biology disorder [4], and we demonstrated that all lymphocyte subsets from the donor had short or very short telomeres by flow fluorescein in situ hybridization [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommendation proposed to allow donors with mild anemia (defined as 2 g/dL below anemia thresholds), mild neutropenia (defined as <1 Â 10 9 neutrophils/L), mild lymphopenia (defined as <.5 Â 10 9 lymphocytes/L), or mild thrombocytopenia (defined as between 100 and 130 Â 10 9 /L) absent a contraindication requires further comment. We and others have found that it is among this group of donors that workup will have the highest likelihood of finding unsuspected inherited hematopoietic malignancy syndromes [1]. Thus, we propose that without specific mention of when and how to evaluate potential donors for inherited susceptibility, the above recommendation may lead to increased risks for both donor and recipient and fall short of the outlined principles of donor/recipient safety in your consensus statement.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 96%