Identifying factors for assessing regional readiness level to manage natural disaster in emergency response periods

Handayani, Naniek Utami; Sari, Diana Puspita; Ulkhaq, M. Mujiya; Nugroho, Adi Setyo; Hanifah, Ajeng

doi:10.1063/5.0000904

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The variables containing the criteria and indicators are then validated using the NGT method, namely by giving questionnaires to respondents with competence in the problem (Handayani et al, 2020). The respondents were the Head of Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Division, Head of Emergency and Logistics Division, Head of Disaster Mitigation Division, and Head of Disaster Preparedness.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The following is the validation results recapitulation from each expert for the main criteria and indicators in Table 3. There are 11 factors for assessing regional readiness in natural disaster management, namely: strengthening the legal framework for disaster management, mainstreaming disaster risk reduction in development, enhancing multi-party partnerships in disaster management, implementing Good Governance in disaster management, increasing the effectiveness of disaster prevention and mitigation, improving preparedness and handling disaster emergencies, increasing disaster recovery capacity, understanding disaster risk, strengthening risk governance, DRR investment for resilience, and improving risk management (Handayani et al, 2020). The AHP method in this study was used to determine the weight of each criterion and indicator used.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Readiness Assessment of the Sleman Regional Disaster Management Agency in Handling and Managing the Mount Merapi Disaster

Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disaster readiness management is the main thing that the government must pay attention to in order to obtain methods as material for evaluating regional disaster management and management. The Regional Disaster Management Agency, hereinafter referred to as BPBD is one of the stakeholders who play an active role and is fully responsible for disaster preparedness in the region, so the Sleman BPBD readiness is crucial in handling and managing the eruption of Mount Merapi. So far, no assessment regarding this readiness has been carried out. This study aims to measure and map BPBD Sleman's readiness to handle and manage Mount Merapi's eruption in Yogyakarta Province. The variables used in this study are variables from the Sendai Framework and the National Disaster Management Plan. This study uses the Nominal Group Technique method for variable validation and the Analytic Hierarchy Process for variable weighting. It then changes the scale from ordinal to interval using the Method of Successive Interval. The next step is to calculate the readiness index by multiplying the results of the indicator assessment by weight. Data processing is carried out using 11 main criteria and 43 indicators. The results of the calculation of the readiness index show that the readiness index value of the Sleman BPBD is 55.362. Based on the index categorization and readiness status, the readiness of Sleman BPBD is in the ready category. Recommendations for improvement are made to indicators with assessment results that have low scores or indexes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Readiness Assessment of the Sleman Regional Disaster Management Agency in Handling and Managing the Mount Merapi Disaster

Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The preparedness level assessment of individual and household in disaster prone area to encounter Merapi Mountains Eruptions Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Handayani,

Sugmasantika,

Mustikasari

et al. 2024

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS 2021 (8th ICETIA 2021):

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Instruments for disaster preparedness evaluation: a scoping review

Lorenzoni

Kainrath

Unterholzner³

et al. 2022

AJEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measuring disaster preparedness has been a challenge as there is no consensus on a standardised approach to evaluation. This lack of clear definitions and performance metrics makes it difficult to determine whether past investments in preparedness have made sense or to see what is missing. This scoping review presents publications addressing the evaluation of disaster preparedness at the governmental level. A literature search was performed to identify relevant journal articles from 5 major scientific databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Business Source Premier and SocINDEX). Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analysed. The review considered the multi-disciplinarily of disaster management and offers a broad overview of the concepts for preparedness evaluation offered in the literature. The results reveal a focus on all-hazards approach as well as local authority level in preparedness evaluation. Variation in the types of instruments used to measure preparedness and the diversity of questions and topics covered in the publications suggest little consensus on what constitutes preparedness and how it should be measured. Many assessment instruments seem to lack use in the field, which limits feedback on them from experts and practitioners. In addition, tools that are easy to use and ready for use by practitioners seem scarce.

show abstract

Identifying factors for assessing regional readiness level to manage natural disaster in emergency response periods

Cited by 3 publications

References 9 publications

Readiness Assessment of the Sleman Regional Disaster Management Agency in Handling and Managing the Mount Merapi Disaster

Readiness Assessment of the Sleman Regional Disaster Management Agency in Handling and Managing the Mount Merapi Disaster

The preparedness level assessment of individual and household in disaster prone area to encounter Merapi Mountains Eruptions Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Instruments for disaster preparedness evaluation: a scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About