2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.01.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying equivalent sound sources from aeroacoustic simulations using a numerical phased array

Abstract: PostprintThis is the accepted version of a paper published in Journal of Sound and Vibration. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.Citation for the original published paper (version of record):Pignier, N., O'Reilly, C J., Boij, S. (2017) Identifying equivalent sound sources from aeroacoustic simulations using a numerical phased array. Journal of Sound and Vibration AbstractAn application of phased array methods to numerical data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acoustic data extracted from the flow computations was propagated to the simulated microphone arrays and processed using several beamforming approaches [33]. In this paper only results obtained with an adapted version of Linear Programming Deconvolution (LPD) [73], called dual-LPD [56], are presented. This method is essentially an alternative version of solving the inverse problem considered in deconvolution methods such as DAMAS [74], but using linear programming.…”
Section: Methods For the Computational Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The acoustic data extracted from the flow computations was propagated to the simulated microphone arrays and processed using several beamforming approaches [33]. In this paper only results obtained with an adapted version of Linear Programming Deconvolution (LPD) [73], called dual-LPD [56], are presented. This method is essentially an alternative version of solving the inverse problem considered in deconvolution methods such as DAMAS [74], but using linear programming.…”
Section: Methods For the Computational Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed explanation about the computational setup and simulations is out of the scope of this paper. More information about the computational setup and the propagation analysis can be found in [33][34][35]56].…”
Section: Computational Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic data extracted from the flow computations was propagated to simulated microphone arrays and processed using several beamforming approaches [27]. In this paper only results obtained with an adapted version of Linear Programming Deconvolution (LPD) [63], called dual-LPD [47], are presented. This method is essentially an alternative version of solving the inverse problem considered in deconvolution methods such [27].…”
Section: Iiic Methods For the Computational Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed explanation about the computational setup and simulations is out of the scope of this paper. More information about the computational setup and the propagation analysis can be found in [27][28][29]47].…”
Section: Iic Computational Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further papers demonstrating applications of the Moore-Penrose matrix inverse within the scope of theoretical physics include, among other, articles: Beylkin et al (2008), where the formulae for the inverse of modified matrices were exploited in a Green's function iteration algorithm introduced to solve the timeindependent, multiparticle Schrödinger equation, He et al (2012), which introduced phase-entanglement and phase-squeezing criteria for two bosonic fields that are robust against a number of fluctuations using the inverse to normalize the particle number operator, Huang and Li (2020), where formulae for the resistance distance and Kirchhoff index of a linear hexagonal (cylinder) chain were derived by means of the inverses of Laplacian matrices, Kametaka et al (2015), where the inverse of singular discrete Laplacian was used to solve difference equations to estimate a maximal deviation of a carbon atom from the steady state in C60 fullerene buckyball, Kirkland (2015) dealing with a quantum state transfer in a quantum walk on a graph, with the inverse used to derive expressions for the first and second partial derivatives of the fidelity of the transfer with respect to a weight of an edge, Kougioumtzoglou et al (2017), where an inverse based frequency response function was introduced to generalize frequency domain random vibration solution methodologies to account for linear and nonlinear structural systems with singular matrices, Lian et al (2019), where the inverse was exploited for calculating charge density distribution through Hartree potential to disclose the physical mechanism of electrostatic potential anomaly in 2D Janus transition metal dichalcogenides, McCartin (2009) reexpressing the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory procedure in terms of the inverse, Meister et al (2014), where the inverse was used to formulate an optimal control algorithm with a control subspace defined by a superposition of arbitrary waveforms, Pignier et al (2017), where a model of an aeroacoustic sound source was created based on compressible flow simulations, with the inverse used to compute the sound source strengths, Ranjan and Zhang (2013) exploring the geometry of complex networks in terms of an Euclidean embedding represented by the inverse of its graph Laplacian, Yang et al (2018), where the inverse was used to solve an equilibrium equation originating in an empirical mode decomposition method combining the static and dynamic information for structural damage detection, and Yang et al (2020), where an expression for the inverse of Laplacian matrices of two connected weighted graphs was established and utilized to derive a recursion formula for the resistance distance.…”
Section: Definition Of the Moore-penrose Inverse According Tomentioning
confidence: 99%