2017
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying dynamic functional connectivity biomarkers using GIG‐ICA: Application to schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic bipolar disorder

Abstract: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown altered brain dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) in mental disorders. Here we aim to explore DFC across a spectrum of symptomatically-related disorders including bipolar disorder with psychosis (BPP), schizoaffective disorder (SAD) and schizophrenia (SZ). We introduce a group information guided independent component analysis (GIG-ICA) procedure to estimate both group-level and subject-specific connectivity states from DFC. Using resting-state f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work could leverage on recent generalizations of CNNs to graphs [52], which can learn representations of graph-structured data lying on irregular or non-Euclidean domains and potentially improve classification of networks. While this study focuses on classifying SZ and HC, further studies could explore application of the MDC-CNN with EEG-based connectome features to automatically discriminate between SZ, schizoaffective disorder and psychotic bipolar disorder which is more difficult in differential diagnosis due to overlapping clinical symptoms [53]. Despite the effectiveness in modeling temporal dependencies in the time-varying functional connectivity, traditional fully-connected LSTM-RNNs suffers the limitation that it takes only vectorized input features which fails to preserve the spatial correlation structure in brain networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work could leverage on recent generalizations of CNNs to graphs [52], which can learn representations of graph-structured data lying on irregular or non-Euclidean domains and potentially improve classification of networks. While this study focuses on classifying SZ and HC, further studies could explore application of the MDC-CNN with EEG-based connectome features to automatically discriminate between SZ, schizoaffective disorder and psychotic bipolar disorder which is more difficult in differential diagnosis due to overlapping clinical symptoms [53]. Despite the effectiveness in modeling temporal dependencies in the time-varying functional connectivity, traditional fully-connected LSTM-RNNs suffers the limitation that it takes only vectorized input features which fails to preserve the spatial correlation structure in brain networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been evidence that brain functional connectivity is time-varying, and clustering (e.g., K-means) and decomposition methods can be used to extract connectivity states from dynamic connectivity patterns (Hutchison et al, 2013;Allen et al, 2014;Calhoun et al, 2014;Preti et al, 2017). Most previous dynamic connectivity studies focused on the dynamics of the connectivity between different brain regions or networks Yu et al, 2015;Du et al, 2016Du et al, , 2017Du et al, , 2018a. A study by Bhinge et al proposed a novel approach to measure both the voxelwise spatial variability in functional networks and the dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC).…”
Section: Identifying Neuroimaging-based Markers For Distinguishing Brmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Calhoun et al performed independent component analysis (ICA) to decompose fMRI data into reduced-dimensional time series and spatial patterns, which were further used for modal fusion and classification prediction (Calhoun and Sui, 2016). Du et al (2017) proposed a new scheme of group information-oriented ICAs to mine dynamic functional connectivity from the fMRI data of patients with various mental disorders, detecting the differences of brain function between groups related to diseases, which were not found by traditional static methods. However, traditional linear machine learning algorithms rely on feature extraction, which cannot handle non-linear and complex relationships in data, and lack the ability to process FCs directly as well (Plis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%