Identifying Dynamic Changes in Water Surface Using Sentinel-1 Data Based on Genetic Algorithm and Machine Learning Techniques

Abstract

The knowledge of water surface changes provides invaluable information for water resources management and flood monitoring. However, the accurate identification of water bodies is a long-term challenge due to human activities and climate change. Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data have been drawn, increasing attention to water extraction due to the availability of weather conditions, water sensitivity and high spatial and temporal resolutions. This study investigated the abilities of random forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and support vector machine (SVM) methods to identify water bodies using Sentinel-1 imageries in the upper stream of the Yangtze River, China. Three sets of hyper-parameters including default values, optimized by grid searches and genetic algorithms, were examined for each model. Model performances were evaluated using a Sentinel-1 image of the developed site and the transfer site. The results showed that SVM outperformed RF and XGB under the three scenarios on both the validated and transfer sites. Among them, SVM optimized by genetic algorithm obtained the best accuracy with precisions of 0.9917 and 0.985, kappa statistics of 0.9833 and 0.97, F1-scores of 0.9919 and 0.9848 on validated and transfer sites, respectively. The best model was then used to identify the dynamic changes in water surfaces during the 2020 flood season in the study area. Overall, the study further demonstrated that SVM optimized using a genetic algorithm was a suitable method for monitoring water surface changes with a Sentinel-1 dataset.

Quantum Based Pseudo-Labelling for Hyperspectral Imagery: A Simple and Efficient Semi-Supervised Learning Method for Machine Learning Classifiers

“…XGBoost with the DCT hybrid ML technique trained with 600 pseudo-labelled samples gave a comparatively higher accuracy (86%) in classifying pine trees. This result can vary if other types of optimization models are used according to Huang, Z [17]. Another combination of XGBoost also performed slightly lower, with accuracies of 83%.…”

“…Different kinds of optimization techniques give different values for the parameters. Zelin Huang et al [17] proved that the parametric values differed between the genetic algorithm and grid search. For this demonstration, we chose Bayesian optimization in this study.…”

Quantifying the Impacts of the 2020 Flood on Crop Production and Food Security in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, China

“…Utilizing different RS techniques to extract cropland, paddy rice fields, and water bodies with multi-source imagery is very popular and advanced in the PRC [12][13][14][15]. Nevertheless, because food security issues are sensitive topics, it is difficult to find similar research to integrate these fields as we did in our study.…”

The Amazon’s 2023 Drought: Sentinel-1 Reveals Extreme Rio Negro River Contraction

“…To map water surfaces with Sentinel-1, several traditional methods are available, such as spectral indices [18], machine learning [19][20][21], dynamic thresholding [22][23][24][25][26], and neural networks [27]. However, recently, the remote sensing scientific community has been adapting to modern deep learning approaches [28].…”