2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.19.436212
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying disease-critical cell types and cellular processes across the human body by integration of single-cell profiles and human genetics

Abstract: Cellular dysfunction is a hallmark of disease. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have provided a powerful means to identify loci and genes contributing to disease risk, but in many cases the related cell types/states through which genes confer disease risk remain unknown. Deciphering such relationships is important both for our understanding of disease, and for developing therapeutic interventions. Here, we introduce a framework for integrating single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), epigenomic maps and GWAS sum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
(366 reference statements)
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimates of proportions of h 2 gene explained by the top 200 genes varied widely across diseases/traits, from 255% (neuroticism) to 404% (height) to 8618% (total cholesterol) (Supplementary Table 20; also see Ge estimates below). Results were similar when restricting to genes expressed in disease-critical cell-types 74 (as proposed in ref. 44 ) (Supplementary Figure 6).…”
Section: Leveraging the Combined S2g Strategy To Empirically Assess Disease Omnigenicitysupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimates of proportions of h 2 gene explained by the top 200 genes varied widely across diseases/traits, from 255% (neuroticism) to 404% (height) to 8618% (total cholesterol) (Supplementary Table 20; also see Ge estimates below). Results were similar when restricting to genes expressed in disease-critical cell-types 74 (as proposed in ref. 44 ) (Supplementary Figure 6).…”
Section: Leveraging the Combined S2g Strategy To Empirically Assess Disease Omnigenicitysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For example, in contrast to the prevailing approach of applying S-LDSC 11 to gene sets using ±100kb windows to define SNP annotations 50,80 , using cS2G to define SNP annotations produced larger heritability enrichments and standardized effect sizes (Supplementary Figure 10; also see ref. 74 ); we further note the importance of including appropriate SNP annotations in the model used by S-LDSC in analyses of enriched gene sets, in order to avoid biased enrichment estimates (see Methods and Supplementary Figure 11). Investigating the relative performance of different combined S2G strategies in analyses of gene sets that are enriched for disease heritability is a direction for future research; although we have focused here on S2G strategies defined using all available tissues/cell-types (see Supplementary Figure 3), tissuespecific S2G strategies may be preferred when analyzing gene sets reflecting genes that are specifically expressed in a particular tissue/cell-type 74 (or when larger data sets become available; see below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the choice of gene sets that we have analyzed is not comprehensive. In particular, analysis of specifically expressed gene sets derived from single-cell RNA-seq data [53] is a promising direction for future research. Fourth, GCSC may be impacted by pleiotropic effects involving SNPs that independently impact gene expression and disease risk (analogous to TWAS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. P. van der Wijst et al, 2018;Zhernakova et al, 2017), time point and stimulation (Cuomo et al, 2020;Strober et al, 2019;Ye et al, 2014) all induce a diversity of expression patterns and interactions with disease-associated genetic loci. Recent studies have combined single cell expression atlases with genetic signals (Jagadeesh et al, 2021;Skene et al, 2018;Smillie et al, 2019;Weeks et al, 2020) to associate risk genes with specific cell types and states in relevant tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%