2015
DOI: 10.1108/s1548-643520150000012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Customer Evangelists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current analysis demonstrates that altruism positively influences customer loyalty and brand evangelism for green brands, supporting hypotheses H 4 (β = 0.612, t = 2.322, p < 0.001) and H 5 (β = 0.231, t = 3.972, p < 0.05). This finding is in line with the observation of Collins et al (2015) and Riorini et al, (2016). Similarly, purchase intention also found to have a positive impact on customer loyalty and brand evangelism for green brands, supporting hypotheses H 6 (β = 0.425, t = 9.236, p < 0.001) and H 7 (β = 0.521, t = 2.432, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current analysis demonstrates that altruism positively influences customer loyalty and brand evangelism for green brands, supporting hypotheses H 4 (β = 0.612, t = 2.322, p < 0.001) and H 5 (β = 0.231, t = 3.972, p < 0.05). This finding is in line with the observation of Collins et al (2015) and Riorini et al, (2016). Similarly, purchase intention also found to have a positive impact on customer loyalty and brand evangelism for green brands, supporting hypotheses H 6 (β = 0.425, t = 9.236, p < 0.001) and H 7 (β = 0.521, t = 2.432, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This signals a weak or insignificant relationship between consumer buying intention and product evangelists. However, Collins et al (2015) indicate that evangelists, who have already been customers, have a stronger purchase intention to buy the product in future as compared to non-customer evangelists. Therefore, the buying process may or may not contribute to a positive and emotional experience (Riorini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Green Purchase Intention Green Brand Loyalty and Green Branmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The mixed results of previous studies highlighted the urgency of the study to broaden into new contexts and sample with additional antecedents and consequences (Casalo, Flavion & Guinaliu, 2010a;Cheung, Lee & Rabjohn, 2008;Kim, Choi, Qualls & Han, 2008). Previous studies attempted to explore the consequences of online brand community based on different perspectives such as brand resonance (brand satisfaction and loyalty) (Hur, Ahn & Kim, 2011) as well as brand evangelism (Becerra & Badrinarayanan, 2013;Doss, 2013;Collins, Glabe, Mizerski & Murphy, 2015). Doss conceptualized brand evangelism as a unidimensional construct, where as Becerra and Badrinarayanan (2013), outlined three major dimensions, namely intention to purchase, positive band referral and oppositional brand referral.…”
Section: The Effect Of Brand Trust and Brand Community Commitment On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doss conceptualized brand evangelism as a unidimensional construct, where as Becerra and Badrinarayanan (2013), outlined three major dimensions, namely intention to purchase, positive band referral and oppositional brand referral. The recent study of Collins Glabe, Mizerski and Murphy (2015) revealed that brand evangelists are higher in terms of satisfaction, perception towards value of the brand, purchase intention, cultishness and knowledge-orientation.…”
Section: The Effect Of Brand Trust and Brand Community Commitment On mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation