2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying coral reef fish larvae through DNA barcoding: A test case with the families Acanthuridae and Holocentridae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of papers have used DNA barcoding to identify a range of larvae more or less as a proof of concept (e.g. Zhang et al 2004;Pegg et al 2006;Hubert et al 2010;Ko et al 2013), but, unfortunately, have not taken the next step and provided descriptions or diagnoses of the larvae thus identified and, in some cases, have neglected to deposit their study specimens in an archival collection. Hubert et al (2014) provided digital photographs of the larvae they barcoded as part of their BOLD entries.…”
Section: Ontogeny and Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers have used DNA barcoding to identify a range of larvae more or less as a proof of concept (e.g. Zhang et al 2004;Pegg et al 2006;Hubert et al 2010;Ko et al 2013), but, unfortunately, have not taken the next step and provided descriptions or diagnoses of the larvae thus identified and, in some cases, have neglected to deposit their study specimens in an archival collection. Hubert et al (2014) provided digital photographs of the larvae they barcoded as part of their BOLD entries.…”
Section: Ontogeny and Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited number of characters, the multiple developmental stages, and the small size of immatures complicate taxonomic assignments (Busby et al 2000;Baldwin andSmith 2003, Richards 2006), making it unlikely that any comprehensive morphological identification system will be developed (Leis and Hay 2004). Molecular methods have gained increasing recognition as an alternative tool for species identification (Garland and Zimmer 2002), and several studies (e.g., Hubert et al 2010;Ko et al 2013;Valdez-Moreno et al 2010) have confirmed that one of these approaches, DNA barcoding, is a powerful tool for identifying larval fishes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant families, however, varies among biogeographical provinces as Sundaland is dominated by the Cyprinidae (231 species; changes during ontogeny, fish identification is not an easy task. After almost a decade, it has become evident that DNA barcoding presents several advantages compared to morphological characters for species identification including: (1) intraspecific phenotypic variation often overlaps that of sister taxa in nature, which can lead to incorrect identifications or species delineations [21,22], (2) DNA barcodes are effective whatever the life stages under scrutiny [23,24] or available biological materials for identification [25,26], (3) spectacular levels of cryptic diversity have been frequently reported using DNA barcoding [21,[27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%