2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.044
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying cognitive subgroups in bipolar disorder: A cluster analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the assessment of the relationship of these cognitive subgroups with number of episodes is incipient and the results inconclusive. While some cross-sectional studies show a tendency toward fewer previous affective episodes in the preserved cognitive functioning group (Burdick et al, 2014;Martino et al, 2018a), other studies do not show differences between subgroups (Lima et al, 2019;Roux et al, 2017;Volkert et al, 2015). Based on our results, we propose that episode density more than the number of episodes could be a more accurate measure of the clinical course to assess this relationship.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…However, the assessment of the relationship of these cognitive subgroups with number of episodes is incipient and the results inconclusive. While some cross-sectional studies show a tendency toward fewer previous affective episodes in the preserved cognitive functioning group (Burdick et al, 2014;Martino et al, 2018a), other studies do not show differences between subgroups (Lima et al, 2019;Roux et al, 2017;Volkert et al, 2015). Based on our results, we propose that episode density more than the number of episodes could be a more accurate measure of the clinical course to assess this relationship.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Furthermore, cognition is said to play a marked role in the course and prognosis of BD illness, 72 but its expression varies when objective and subjective assessments are compared. Studies report a weak correlation between these two types of cognitive assessment 71,73,74 . Although subjectively reported cognitive complaints and objectively assessed neuropsychological tests are intertwined by certain discrepancies, it is important to highlight that FAST is a semi‐objective instrument; therefore, these data reinforce the cognitive impairment found in other studies and underscore the importance of this topic in patients’ lives and functioning 60 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In fact, cluster analysis studies have reported within‐group heterogeneity in the cognitive performance of individuals with BD, suggesting the existence of subgroups based on performance. While some authors divide them into similar to the HC range and selective cognitive impairment (representing almost one‐third of the sample), 66,67 others divide the impaired group into selective cognitive impairment (modest deficits on only a subset of domains) and global severe impairment (deficit across most of the cognitive domains) 68‐71 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both bipolar disorder and schizophrenia are considered heterogeneous disorders. Heterogeneity in bipolar disorder has been reported in genetic architecture 20,21 , cognitive profiles [22][23][24][25][26] , and clinical symptoms 27,28 . Likewise, heterogeneity in schizophrenia has been noted at the genetic 29 , cognitive 12,30 , and clinical level [31][32][33] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%