2010
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying co-morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score

Abstract: The RCS Charlson Score identifies co-morbidity in surgical patients in England at least as well as existing instruments. Given its explicit coding philosophy, it may be used as a co-morbidity scoring instrument for international comparisons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
267
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
267
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a secondary assessment, following a recent consensus statement on the use of administrative data in risk adjustment 14 , the recording of the co-morbidities contained in the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Charlson score was quantified. Risk adjustment of mortality analyses was done using a model containing age, sex and the RCS Charlson score.…”
Section: Co-morbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a secondary assessment, following a recent consensus statement on the use of administrative data in risk adjustment 14 , the recording of the co-morbidities contained in the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Charlson score was quantified. Risk adjustment of mortality analyses was done using a model containing age, sex and the RCS Charlson score.…”
Section: Co-morbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the HES episode history up to one year prior to the hip replacement, the presence of any co-morbid conditions of this subgroup was assessed using the method described by Armitage et al 10 The number of co-morbid conditions is presented using the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson score, defined as a score of 0, 1, 2, 3 or more.…”
Section: Co-morbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCS Charlson score looks at 14 disease categories developed by a consensus group 23. Until now, the existing literature has focused on the PE rates in foot and ankle surgery as a whole, mostly including trauma cases due to the higher volumes compared to elective surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a validated tool that is a count of chronic comorbid conditions that may affect the outcome of surgery. 23 We combined the comorbidity count to form two groups for analysis; this was due to the small numbers of PEs in each group.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%